S54 Long-Term Surveillance of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Malignant Transformation and High-Risk Progression Beyond 10 Years

Introduction: The optimal duration of surveillance for pancreatic cystic lesions remains uncertain. Existing guidelines vary in their recommendations, with limited long-term data beyond 10 years. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to address this gap by providing a summative resource of studies evaluating outcomes of patients undergoing ≥10 years of surveillance for pancreatic cystic lesions without surgical intervention. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and CINAHL from inception through November 2024. Eligible studies included adult patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) or mucinous cystic neoplasms under surveillance, with at least some patients followed beyond 10 years. Outcomes of interest were clinically significant progression (development of high-risk stigmata or worrisome features), pancreatic cancer incidence, and pancreatic cancer-related mortality. Pooled proportions were calculated using a random-effects model. Study quality was assessed using the CASP cohort checklist. Results: Thirty-five studies involving 18,835 pancreatic cystic lesions were included. The pooled proportion of clinically significant progression was 8.4% (1,605/16,416; 95% CI, 5.3–13%; I² = 94%). Pancreatic cancer developed in 2.1% of patients (536/18,512; 95% CI, 1.5–2.9%; I² = 86%), and pancreatic cancer-related mortality was 0.9% (95% CI, 0.6–1.4%; I² = 48%). Worrisome features and mural nodules emerged in 11.8% and 3.2% of cysts, respectively. Substantial heterogeneity was observed across most outcomes. Publication bias was present for progression and malignancy estimates. Conclusion: Despite variability in follow-up duration and surveillance practices, a meaningful proportion of cysts developed high-risk features or malignant transformation even after prolonged periods of stability. Surveillance strategies should be individualized based on cyst features, patient comorbidities, life expectancy, and surgical candidacy. Relying on fixed-duration surveillance alone may lead to missed opportunities for early intervention or overuse of resources in minimal-risk populations. Improved risk stratification tools are needed to guide tailored, evidence-based decision-making in the long-term management of pancreatic cystic lesions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001126676.12335.5e
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S54 Long-Term Surveillance of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Malignant Transformation and High-Risk Progression Beyond 10 Years

Jamie F. Conklin, Jay Bapaye, Ángel Miro-Gonzalez, Andrew Canakis et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

S54 Long-Term Surveillance of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Malignant Transformation and High-Risk Progression Beyond 10 Years

Jamie F. Conklin, Jay Bapaye, Ángel Miro-Gonzalez, Andrew Canakis, Shivani Desai
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The optimal duration of surveillance for pancreatic cystic lesions remains uncertain. Existing guidelines vary in their recommendations, with limited long-term data beyond 10 years. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to address this gap by providing a summative resource of studies evaluating outcomes of patients undergoing ≥10 years of surveillance for pancreatic cystic lesions without surgical intervention. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and CINAHL from inception through November 2024. Eligible studies included adult patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) or mucinous cystic neoplasms under surveillance, with at least some patients followed beyond 10 years. Outcomes of interest were clinically significant progression (development of high-risk stigmata or worrisome features), pancreatic cancer incidence, and pancreatic cancer-related mortality. Pooled proportions were calculated using a random-effects model. Study quality was assessed using the CASP cohort checklist. Results: Thirty-five studies involving 18,835 pancreatic cystic lesions were included. The pooled proportion of clinically significant progression was 8.4% (1,605/16,416; 95% CI, 5.3–13%; I² = 94%). Pancreatic cancer developed in 2.1% of patients (536/18,512; 95% CI, 1.5–2.9%; I² = 86%), and pancreatic cancer-related mortality was 0.9% (95% CI, 0.6–1.4%; I² = 48%). Worrisome features and mural nodules emerged in 11.8% and 3.2% of cysts, respectively. Substantial heterogeneity was observed across most outcomes. Publication bias was present for progression and malignancy estimates. Conclusion: Despite variability in follow-up duration and surveillance practices, a meaningful proportion of cysts developed high-risk features or malignant transformation even after prolonged periods of stability. Surveillance strategies should be individualized based on cyst features, patient comorbidities, life expectancy, and surgical candidacy. Relying on fixed-duration surveillance alone may lead to missed opportunities for early intervention or overuse of resources in minimal-risk populations. Improved risk stratification tools are needed to guide tailored, evidence-based decision-making in the long-term management of pancreatic cystic lesions.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.