S49 Lactate Levels Don't Lie: A Powerful Predictor in Acute Cholangitis

Introduction: Acute cholangitis is a life-threatening condition that requires timely diagnosis and intervention. The Tokyo Guidelines serve as the primary framework for diagnosing and grading acute cholangitis, incorporating clinical symptoms, inflammatory markers, and imaging findings. However, lactate levels, a widely recognized biomarker is not included in these criteria. Elevated lactate has been associated with poor outcomes in sepsis and critical illness, yet its role in risk stratification for cholangitis remains unexplored. In this study, we aim to evaluate the prognostic significance of lactate in patients with cholangitis. By conducting a propensity-matched cohort analysis, we compare outcomes between patients with normal lactate (0-2 mmol/L) and those with elevated lactate (2-12 mmol/L) to determine whether lactate should be integrated into the Tokyo Guidelines for improved risk assessment and clinical decision-making. Methods: This retrospective propensity-matched cohort study evaluated patients diagnosed with cholangitis using ICD-10 codes, stratified into 2 groups based on lactate levels: 0–2 mmol/L and 2–12 mmol/L. One-to-one matching was performed to minimize confounding, adjusting for demographics (age, sex, race, ethnicity), Charlson Comorbidity Index components (e.g., cardiovascular, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, and oncologic conditions), and clinical variables (albumin levels, fever). Outcomes within 1 month were compared, including mortality, sepsis/bacteremia, intensive care unit admission, vasopressor use, and interventions such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), cholecystectomy, and cholecystostomy tube placement. Results: Patients with elevated Lactate levels had worse outcomes in comparison. Mortality: RR 2.659; P < 0.001. Sepsis/Bacteremia: RR 1.182; P < 0.001. Vasopressor Use: RR 1.162; P < 0.001. ICU Admission: RR 0.744; P = 0.072. ERCP: RR 0.886; P = 0.019. Cholecystectomy: RR 0.692; P = 0.003. Cholecystostomy Tube: RR 1.043; P = 0.559. Conclusion: This propensity-matched analysis demonstrates that elevated lactate levels are a strong predictor of adverse outcomes in cholangitis. Patients with lactate 2-12 mmol/L have significantly higher mortality, sepsis rates, and vasopressor use, yet are less likely to undergo ERCP or cholecystectomy. Given these findings, lactate should be considered for inclusion in the Tokyo Guidelines as a key risk stratification tool. Future prospective studies are warranted to establish optimal lactate thresholds for guiding management decisions in cholangitis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001126656.34894.89
Primary Topic
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S49 Lactate Levels Don't Lie: A Powerful Predictor in Acute Cholangitis

Imran Qureshi, Sanmeet Singh, Muhammad Ali Ibrahim Kazi, Nirav Agrawal et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
article

S49 Lactate Levels Don't Lie: A Powerful Predictor in Acute Cholangitis

Imran Qureshi, Sanmeet Singh, Muhammad Ali Ibrahim Kazi, Nirav Agrawal, Akshay Sharma, Patel Manthanbhai
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Acute cholangitis is a life-threatening condition that requires timely diagnosis and intervention. The Tokyo Guidelines serve as the primary framework for diagnosing and grading acute cholangitis, incorporating clinical symptoms, inflammatory markers, and imaging findings. However, lactate levels, a widely recognized biomarker is not included in these criteria. Elevated lactate has been associated with poor outcomes in sepsis and critical illness, yet its role in risk stratification for cholangitis remains unexplored. In this study, we aim to evaluate the prognostic significance of lactate in patients with cholangitis. By conducting a propensity-matched cohort analysis, we compare outcomes between patients with normal lactate (0-2 mmol/L) and those with elevated lactate (2-12 mmol/L) to determine whether lactate should be integrated into the Tokyo Guidelines for improved risk assessment and clinical decision-making. Methods: This retrospective propensity-matched cohort study evaluated patients diagnosed with cholangitis using ICD-10 codes, stratified into 2 groups based on lactate levels: 0–2 mmol/L and 2–12 mmol/L. One-to-one matching was performed to minimize confounding, adjusting for demographics (age, sex, race, ethnicity), Charlson Comorbidity Index components (e.g., cardiovascular, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, and oncologic conditions), and clinical variables (albumin levels, fever). Outcomes within 1 month were compared, including mortality, sepsis/bacteremia, intensive care unit admission, vasopressor use, and interventions such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), cholecystectomy, and cholecystostomy tube placement. Results: Patients with elevated Lactate levels had worse outcomes in comparison. Mortality: RR 2.659; P < 0.001. Sepsis/Bacteremia: RR 1.182; P < 0.001. Vasopressor Use: RR 1.162; P < 0.001. ICU Admission: RR 0.744; P = 0.072. ERCP: RR 0.886; P = 0.019. Cholecystectomy: RR 0.692; P = 0.003. Cholecystostomy Tube: RR 1.043; P = 0.559. Conclusion: This propensity-matched analysis demonstrates that elevated lactate levels are a strong predictor of adverse outcomes in cholangitis. Patients with lactate 2-12 mmol/L have significantly higher mortality, sepsis rates, and vasopressor use, yet are less likely to undergo ERCP or cholecystectomy. Given these findings, lactate should be considered for inclusion in the Tokyo Guidelines as a key risk stratification tool. Future prospective studies are warranted to establish optimal lactate thresholds for guiding management decisions in cholangitis.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.