S57 Efficacy and Safety of Double Guidewire vs Transpancreatic Papillotomy in Difficult Biliary Cannulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Introduction: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a therapeutic procedure for hepatobiliary and pancreatic disorders. Selective cannulation of the common bile duct is a crucial step. Difficult biliary cannulation increases the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis. In cases of failed standard cannulation, transpancreatic sphincterotomy or double guidewire techniques can be employed. This review and meta-analysis aim to compare the efficacy of transpancreatic sphincterotomy and double guidewire in difficult biliary cannulation, focus on post-ERCP adverse events, particularly pancreatitis, and the success rates of cannulation. Methods: This review involved searching Medline, Embase, Lilacs, Central Cochrane, and Google Scholar for studies comparing double guide wire vs transpancreatic sphincterotomy. Outcomes assessed included pancreatitis, successful biliary cannulation, mean cannulation time, and other adverse events. Results: A total of 463 patients from 5 randomized controlled trials were included. The double guidewire group showed a higher risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis and other adverse events (P = 0.009; RR = 1.81 [1.16, 2.83]; I² = 34%) and (P = 0.03; RR = 2.20 [1.10, 4.39]; I² = 0%), respectively. A significant difference favoring transpancreatic was found for successful cannulation and mild pancreatitis (P = 0.01; RR = 0.85 [0.76, 0.94]; I² = 39%) and (P = 0.01; RR = 2.26 [1.20, 4.28]; I² = 35%), respectively. No significant difference was observed for mean cannulation time or moderate to severe pancreatitis (P = 0.18; SMD = -0.37 [–0.91, 0.17]; I² = 79%) and (P = 0.32; RR = 0.97 [0.93, 1.03]; I² = 0%), respectively. A restricted analysis excluding 2 studies that contained external factors inflating the pancreatitis statistics no longer showed a significant difference (P = 0.61; RR = 1.16 [0.66, 2.04]; I² = 0%). Conclusion: Our results provide the highest evidence level, indicating that transpancreatic sphincterotomy may have higher success rates for cannulation and lower post-ERCP pancreatitis and complication rates.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001126688.38140.62
Primary Topic
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S57 Efficacy and Safety of Double Guidewire vs Transpancreatic Papillotomy in Difficult Biliary Cannulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Mateus Pereira Funari, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura, Miriam Chinzon, Luiza Bicudo de Oliveira et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
article

S57 Efficacy and Safety of Double Guidewire vs Transpancreatic Papillotomy in Difficult Biliary Cannulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Mateus Pereira Funari, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura, Miriam Chinzon, Luiza Bicudo de Oliveira, Matheus Oliveira Veras, Larissa Mercadante de Assis
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a therapeutic procedure for hepatobiliary and pancreatic disorders. Selective cannulation of the common bile duct is a crucial step. Difficult biliary cannulation increases the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis. In cases of failed standard cannulation, transpancreatic sphincterotomy or double guidewire techniques can be employed. This review and meta-analysis aim to compare the efficacy of transpancreatic sphincterotomy and double guidewire in difficult biliary cannulation, focus on post-ERCP adverse events, particularly pancreatitis, and the success rates of cannulation. Methods: This review involved searching Medline, Embase, Lilacs, Central Cochrane, and Google Scholar for studies comparing double guide wire vs transpancreatic sphincterotomy. Outcomes assessed included pancreatitis, successful biliary cannulation, mean cannulation time, and other adverse events. Results: A total of 463 patients from 5 randomized controlled trials were included. The double guidewire group showed a higher risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis and other adverse events (P = 0.009; RR = 1.81 [1.16, 2.83]; I² = 34%) and (P = 0.03; RR = 2.20 [1.10, 4.39]; I² = 0%), respectively. A significant difference favoring transpancreatic was found for successful cannulation and mild pancreatitis (P = 0.01; RR = 0.85 [0.76, 0.94]; I² = 39%) and (P = 0.01; RR = 2.26 [1.20, 4.28]; I² = 35%), respectively. No significant difference was observed for mean cannulation time or moderate to severe pancreatitis (P = 0.18; SMD = -0.37 [–0.91, 0.17]; I² = 79%) and (P = 0.32; RR = 0.97 [0.93, 1.03]; I² = 0%), respectively. A restricted analysis excluding 2 studies that contained external factors inflating the pancreatitis statistics no longer showed a significant difference (P = 0.61; RR = 1.16 [0.66, 2.04]; I² = 0%). Conclusion: Our results provide the highest evidence level, indicating that transpancreatic sphincterotomy may have higher success rates for cannulation and lower post-ERCP pancreatitis and complication rates.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.