S3298 Multidisciplinary Management of a Pancreatic Mucinous Cystic Neoplasm During Pregnancy: A Gastroenterologist’s Role in Diagnosis and Guidance

Introduction: Mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs) of the pancreas are rare, typically arising in women around the age of 40 and seldom encountered during pregnancy. These cystic tumors are defined by the presence of ovarian-type stroma and usually occur in the pancreatic body or tail without ductal communication. Unique challenges arise when MCNs are discovered in pregnancy due to diagnostic uncertainty, fetal considerations, and timing of surgical intervention. Case Description/Methods: We report the case of a 25-year-old primigravida at 19.3 weeks gestation who was found to have a large mixed cystic and solid mass initially presumed to be of ovarian origin. Exploratory laparotomy revealed the mass to originate from the left upper retroperitoneum, prompting further evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging, which suggested a solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreatic body and tail. A multidisciplinary team, including gastroenterology, maternal-fetal medicine, and surgery, collaborated on a management plan that prioritized maternal and fetal safety. The patient underwent endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) at 21 weeks, yielding fluid with elevated CEA (1182 ng/mL) but no malignant cells. After extensive counseling, the patient opted for postpartum surgical resection. At 1 month postpartum, she underwent successful distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy. Gross pathology revealed a cystic mass measuring 19 × 16 × 15 cm. Final pathology confirmed a MCN with ovarian-type stroma and no evidence of high-grade dysplasia or malignancy. Discussion: This case highlights the diagnostic and management complexities of pancreatic MCNs in pregnancy, including the utility of safe imaging modalities, the role of EUS-FNA in risk stratification, and the importance of individualized decision-making. Gastroenterology played a pivotal role in diagnostic clarification and therapeutic planning with EUS-FNA, providing critical data while balancing fetal safety. As pancreatic MCNs are rarely encountered in this setting, this case underscores the value of endoscopic evaluation and shared decision-making in guiding management on an individualized basis. Factors such as cyst size, imaging characteristics, and gestational age must all be weighed when determining timing of intervention. Postpartum resection in this case led to a favorable maternal and fetal outcome, underscoring the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary, case-specific approach.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001140652.34229.0a
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S3298 Multidisciplinary Management of a Pancreatic Mucinous Cystic Neoplasm During Pregnancy: A Gastroenterologist’s Role in Diagnosis and Guidance

Nathan Tofteland, John Thesing, Meagan H. Phox
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

S3298 Multidisciplinary Management of a Pancreatic Mucinous Cystic Neoplasm During Pregnancy: A Gastroenterologist’s Role in Diagnosis and Guidance

Nathan Tofteland, John Thesing, Meagan H. Phox
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs) of the pancreas are rare, typically arising in women around the age of 40 and seldom encountered during pregnancy. These cystic tumors are defined by the presence of ovarian-type stroma and usually occur in the pancreatic body or tail without ductal communication. Unique challenges arise when MCNs are discovered in pregnancy due to diagnostic uncertainty, fetal considerations, and timing of surgical intervention. Case Description/Methods: We report the case of a 25-year-old primigravida at 19.3 weeks gestation who was found to have a large mixed cystic and solid mass initially presumed to be of ovarian origin. Exploratory laparotomy revealed the mass to originate from the left upper retroperitoneum, prompting further evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging, which suggested a solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreatic body and tail. A multidisciplinary team, including gastroenterology, maternal-fetal medicine, and surgery, collaborated on a management plan that prioritized maternal and fetal safety. The patient underwent endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) at 21 weeks, yielding fluid with elevated CEA (1182 ng/mL) but no malignant cells. After extensive counseling, the patient opted for postpartum surgical resection. At 1 month postpartum, she underwent successful distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy. Gross pathology revealed a cystic mass measuring 19 × 16 × 15 cm. Final pathology confirmed a MCN with ovarian-type stroma and no evidence of high-grade dysplasia or malignancy. Discussion: This case highlights the diagnostic and management complexities of pancreatic MCNs in pregnancy, including the utility of safe imaging modalities, the role of EUS-FNA in risk stratification, and the importance of individualized decision-making. Gastroenterology played a pivotal role in diagnostic clarification and therapeutic planning with EUS-FNA, providing critical data while balancing fetal safety. As pancreatic MCNs are rarely encountered in this setting, this case underscores the value of endoscopic evaluation and shared decision-making in guiding management on an individualized basis. Factors such as cyst size, imaging characteristics, and gestational age must all be weighed when determining timing of intervention. Postpartum resection in this case led to a favorable maternal and fetal outcome, underscoring the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary, case-specific approach.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.