S76 Does IDUS Improve Diagnostic Yield of Brush Cytology in Malignant Biliary Strictures? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Brush cytology during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is widely used for diagnosing malignant biliary strictures but suffers from low sensitivity. Intraductal ultrasound (IDUS) offers high-resolution imaging that can help target suspicious areas, potentially improving the diagnostic yield of brush cytology. However, the added value of IDUS-guided brush cytology over brush cytology alone remains unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate whether IDUS guidance enhances the diagnostic performance of brush cytology in detecting malignant biliary strictures. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Ovid, and Cochrane to identify studies comparing IDUS-guided brush cytology vs brush cytology alone for the diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures. Studies reporting diagnostic outcomes such as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were included. Pooled outcomes were calculated using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Results: Five studies with a total of 663 patients were included in the meta-analysis (IDUS-guided brush cytology: N = 384; brush cytology alone: N = 279). IDUS-guided brush cytology was associated with significantly improved diagnostic performance. The RR for sensitivity was 1.85 (95% CI: 1.36–2.53; P < 0.001; I² = 71.8), and for negative predictive value, RR was 1.44 (95% CI: 1.15–1.81; P = 0.002; I² = 66.4). Diagnostic accuracy was also higher with IDUS-guided brush cytology (RR 1.27, 95% CI: 1.07–1.50; P = 0.007; I² = 75). However, specificity (RR 0.88, 95% CI: 0.81–0.97; P = 0.012; I² = 61.5) and positive predictive value (RR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.83–0.95; P < 0.001; I² = 16.1) were slightly lower in the IDUS-guided brush cytology group. Conclusion: IDUS-guided brush cytology significantly improves the diagnostic sensitivity, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy for detecting malignant biliary strictures compared to brush cytology alone. These findings support the adjunctive use of IDUS during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography to enhance diagnostic yield and better guide clinical management.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001126764.92990.5b
Primary Topic
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S76 Does IDUS Improve Diagnostic Yield of Brush Cytology in Malignant Biliary Strictures? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Smit Deliwala, Antonio Facciorusso, Shahab R. Khan, Saurabh Chandan et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
article

S76 Does IDUS Improve Diagnostic Yield of Brush Cytology in Malignant Biliary Strictures? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Smit Deliwala, Antonio Facciorusso, Shahab R. Khan, Saurabh Chandan, Tony Brar, Yaseen Perbtani, Hassam Ali, Harsimran Kalsi
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Brush cytology during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is widely used for diagnosing malignant biliary strictures but suffers from low sensitivity. Intraductal ultrasound (IDUS) offers high-resolution imaging that can help target suspicious areas, potentially improving the diagnostic yield of brush cytology. However, the added value of IDUS-guided brush cytology over brush cytology alone remains unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate whether IDUS guidance enhances the diagnostic performance of brush cytology in detecting malignant biliary strictures. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Ovid, and Cochrane to identify studies comparing IDUS-guided brush cytology vs brush cytology alone for the diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures. Studies reporting diagnostic outcomes such as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were included. Pooled outcomes were calculated using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Results: Five studies with a total of 663 patients were included in the meta-analysis (IDUS-guided brush cytology: N = 384; brush cytology alone: N = 279). IDUS-guided brush cytology was associated with significantly improved diagnostic performance. The RR for sensitivity was 1.85 (95% CI: 1.36–2.53; P < 0.001; I² = 71.8), and for negative predictive value, RR was 1.44 (95% CI: 1.15–1.81; P = 0.002; I² = 66.4). Diagnostic accuracy was also higher with IDUS-guided brush cytology (RR 1.27, 95% CI: 1.07–1.50; P = 0.007; I² = 75). However, specificity (RR 0.88, 95% CI: 0.81–0.97; P = 0.012; I² = 61.5) and positive predictive value (RR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.83–0.95; P < 0.001; I² = 16.1) were slightly lower in the IDUS-guided brush cytology group. Conclusion: IDUS-guided brush cytology significantly improves the diagnostic sensitivity, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy for detecting malignant biliary strictures compared to brush cytology alone. These findings support the adjunctive use of IDUS during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography to enhance diagnostic yield and better guide clinical management.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.