S59 Fibrates as an Adjunct Therapy in Primary Biliary Cholangitis: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events

Introduction: Fibrates are a second line agents in the treatment of Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC). Even though fibrates have been shown to improve cholestatic enzymes in PBC, it is unclear whether fibrates confer additional cardiovascular benefit or risk in this population. To address this knowledge gap, we compared major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in a large propensity-matched PBC cohort treated with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) alone or with UDCA plus a fibrate in a large research database. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis using the TriNetX Research Network (104 United States healthcare organizations, 2005 to 2024). Adults with diagnosis of PBC receiving UDCA constituted the source population. Cohort A was also prescribed an additional fibrate (fenofibrate, gemfibrozil, bezafibrate, or ciprofibrate); Cohort B received UDCA monotherapy. One-to-one nearest-neighbor propensity-score matching balanced age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, baseline lipid panel, and other cardiovascular comorbidities, yielding 1,580 patients per cohort. The primary outcome was 5-year cumulative incidence of MACE, defined as acute myocardial infarction, acute heart failure, ischemic heart disease, or cerebral infarction. Secondary outcomes were the individual MACE components and all-cause mortality. Risks were expressed as risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals; time-to-event differences were assessed with Kaplan–Meier curves and hazard ratios (HR). Results: The fibrate cohort had higher baseline total cholesterol (212.7 ± 90.0 vs 191.5 ± 66.7 mg/dL, P < 0.001) and triglycerides (165.6 ± 130.0 vs 121.4 ± 68.3 mg/dL, P < 0.001), but the 2 groups were well balanced on all other variables (all P-values >0.05). Over a 5-year period, fibrate and UCDA-only patients did not differ in the incidence of MACE (HR 1.09, 0.91-1.29, P = 0.35), no individual MACE components (all P-values >0.05), or all-cause mortality (HR 0.92, 0.73-1.16, P = 0.47). Conclusion: In this large U.S. real-world cohort, adding a fibrate to UDCA did not significantly increase MACE or mortality despite a more atherogenic lipid profile at baseline. The modest, nonsignificant excess in event rates likely reflects residual confounding from patients selected for fibrate therapy because of dyslipidemia. These real-world data suggests that fibrates is well-tolerated and without adverse major cardiovascular events as an adjunct therapy in PBC.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001126696.36980.ab
Primary Topic
Liver Diseases and Immunity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S59 Fibrates as an Adjunct Therapy in Primary Biliary Cholangitis: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events

Walid Hazem, Hussam Kawas, Mohammad Alabbas, Omar T. Sims et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Liver Diseases and Immunity
article

S59 Fibrates as an Adjunct Therapy in Primary Biliary Cholangitis: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events

Walid Hazem, Hussam Kawas, Mohammad Alabbas, Omar T. Sims, Mohamad-Noor Abu-Hammour, Barish Eren, Dian Chiang
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Fibrates are a second line agents in the treatment of Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC). Even though fibrates have been shown to improve cholestatic enzymes in PBC, it is unclear whether fibrates confer additional cardiovascular benefit or risk in this population. To address this knowledge gap, we compared major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in a large propensity-matched PBC cohort treated with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) alone or with UDCA plus a fibrate in a large research database. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis using the TriNetX Research Network (104 United States healthcare organizations, 2005 to 2024). Adults with diagnosis of PBC receiving UDCA constituted the source population. Cohort A was also prescribed an additional fibrate (fenofibrate, gemfibrozil, bezafibrate, or ciprofibrate); Cohort B received UDCA monotherapy. One-to-one nearest-neighbor propensity-score matching balanced age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, baseline lipid panel, and other cardiovascular comorbidities, yielding 1,580 patients per cohort. The primary outcome was 5-year cumulative incidence of MACE, defined as acute myocardial infarction, acute heart failure, ischemic heart disease, or cerebral infarction. Secondary outcomes were the individual MACE components and all-cause mortality. Risks were expressed as risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals; time-to-event differences were assessed with Kaplan–Meier curves and hazard ratios (HR). Results: The fibrate cohort had higher baseline total cholesterol (212.7 ± 90.0 vs 191.5 ± 66.7 mg/dL, P < 0.001) and triglycerides (165.6 ± 130.0 vs 121.4 ± 68.3 mg/dL, P < 0.001), but the 2 groups were well balanced on all other variables (all P-values >0.05). Over a 5-year period, fibrate and UCDA-only patients did not differ in the incidence of MACE (HR 1.09, 0.91-1.29, P = 0.35), no individual MACE components (all P-values >0.05), or all-cause mortality (HR 0.92, 0.73-1.16, P = 0.47). Conclusion: In this large U.S. real-world cohort, adding a fibrate to UDCA did not significantly increase MACE or mortality despite a more atherogenic lipid profile at baseline. The modest, nonsignificant excess in event rates likely reflects residual confounding from patients selected for fibrate therapy because of dyslipidemia. These real-world data suggests that fibrates is well-tolerated and without adverse major cardiovascular events as an adjunct therapy in PBC.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Liver Diseases and Immunity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.