S84 Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models for Pancreatic Cancer Risk in New-Onset Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical/Biochemical and Genetic Indicators

Introduction: Pancreatic cancer progresses silently, often presenting after disease has advanced beyond curative stages. A subset of patients with newly diagnosed diabetes may exhibit early signs of pancreatic malignancy. Machine learning algorithms have emerged as tools for analyzing complex clinical, biochemical, and genetic markers to identify high-risk individuals. Despite growing popularity, the predictive accuracy and consistency of these models remain unclear. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. Data from 14 studies across PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar (inception to 2025) that developed machine learning models to predict pancreatic cancer in new-onset diabetes patients were combined. The primary outcome was area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Random-effects meta-analysis pooled diagnostic accuracy measures, with heterogeneity assessed using I² statistics. Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis evaluated robustness of findings. Results: Fourteen studies with over 2.2 million participants from 6 countries were included. Studies employed various machine learning approaches including random forest, logistic regression, and neural networks. Data sources included population biobanks and healthcare databases. The pooled AUC was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.72-0.82), indicating good discriminative performance. Individual AUCs ranged from 0.71 to 0.93, with substantial heterogeneity (I² = 98.95%, P < 0.01). Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis confirmed robustness with consistent estimates of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.72-0.82). Studies utilized diverse predictors including biochemical parameters, demographics, genetic variants, and clinical indicators. Models incorporating clinical and genetic data achieved higher performance. Conclusion: Machine learning models demonstrate good diagnostic accuracy for pancreatic cancer risk prediction in new-onset diabetes (pooled AUC 0.77). Despite heterogeneity, sensitivity analyses confirmed robust findings. These models show promise for clinical implementation as risk stratification tools, enabling earlier detection in high-risk populations. Future research should focus on external validation and clinical integration.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001126796.36756.93
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S84 Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models for Pancreatic Cancer Risk in New-Onset Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical/Biochemical and Genetic Indicators

Salma Abdelhafez, Jay Patel, Sri Anjali Gorle, Rupak Desai et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
article

S84 Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models for Pancreatic Cancer Risk in New-Onset Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical/Biochemical and Genetic Indicators

Salma Abdelhafez, Jay Patel, Sri Anjali Gorle, Rupak Desai, Marwa N. AbdelHafez, Utkarsh Dayal, Ahmad Alhomaid, Neha Singh, Sindhura Reddy Dadi
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Pancreatic cancer progresses silently, often presenting after disease has advanced beyond curative stages. A subset of patients with newly diagnosed diabetes may exhibit early signs of pancreatic malignancy. Machine learning algorithms have emerged as tools for analyzing complex clinical, biochemical, and genetic markers to identify high-risk individuals. Despite growing popularity, the predictive accuracy and consistency of these models remain unclear. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. Data from 14 studies across PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar (inception to 2025) that developed machine learning models to predict pancreatic cancer in new-onset diabetes patients were combined. The primary outcome was area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Random-effects meta-analysis pooled diagnostic accuracy measures, with heterogeneity assessed using I² statistics. Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis evaluated robustness of findings. Results: Fourteen studies with over 2.2 million participants from 6 countries were included. Studies employed various machine learning approaches including random forest, logistic regression, and neural networks. Data sources included population biobanks and healthcare databases. The pooled AUC was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.72-0.82), indicating good discriminative performance. Individual AUCs ranged from 0.71 to 0.93, with substantial heterogeneity (I² = 98.95%, P < 0.01). Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis confirmed robustness with consistent estimates of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.72-0.82). Studies utilized diverse predictors including biochemical parameters, demographics, genetic variants, and clinical indicators. Models incorporating clinical and genetic data achieved higher performance. Conclusion: Machine learning models demonstrate good diagnostic accuracy for pancreatic cancer risk prediction in new-onset diabetes (pooled AUC 0.77). Despite heterogeneity, sensitivity analyses confirmed robust findings. These models show promise for clinical implementation as risk stratification tools, enabling earlier detection in high-risk populations. Future research should focus on external validation and clinical integration.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.