Does Cultural Fit Predict Well‐Adapted Personality? A Cross‐Cultural Comparison Between Turkey and Germany

Using samples from Turkey and Germany, which at a country level differ along individualism-collectivism and vertical-horizontal focus, the present study, through measurement-invariant scales and multigroup SEM analysis, found that vertical collectivism and vertical individualism, which generally predict reduced well-being across groups and individuals, indicate unhealthy Big-Five personality factor levels for individuals in a country only when the country sample scores higher on these dimensions. Horizontal focus linked with improved well-being was more characteristic of the German than the Turkish sample and predicted adaptive personality factor levels linked with well-being equally in both country samples. Individuals' cultural self-construal deviance scores from their country sample mean did not produce any significant effects in any country sample. Both countries' individualism and collectivism predicted a healthy personality profile when connected with horizontal focus. The results show that cultural fit could be unhealthy when the cultural dimension (e.g., vertical focus) defining fit predicts reduced well-being and aversive outcomes across individuals and societies, with implications for the subjective well-being of individuals with a migration background in adapting to a host culture such as individuals of Turkish origin in Germany or Syrian refugees in Turkey.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Psychology
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.70129
Primary Topic
Cultural Differences and Values
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Cultural Fit Predict Well‐Adapted Personality? A Cross‐Cultural Comparison Between Turkey and Germany

İbrahim Şenay, Seher Sav
International Journal of Psychology
Cultural Differences and Values
article

Does Cultural Fit Predict Well‐Adapted Personality? A Cross‐Cultural Comparison Between Turkey and Germany

İbrahim Şenay, Seher Sav
article en

Abstract

Using samples from Turkey and Germany, which at a country level differ along individualism-collectivism and vertical-horizontal focus, the present study, through measurement-invariant scales and multigroup SEM analysis, found that vertical collectivism and vertical individualism, which generally predict reduced well-being across groups and individuals, indicate unhealthy Big-Five personality factor levels for individuals in a country only when the country sample scores higher on these dimensions. Horizontal focus linked with improved well-being was more characteristic of the German than the Turkish sample and predicted adaptive personality factor levels linked with well-being equally in both country samples. Individuals' cultural self-construal deviance scores from their country sample mean did not produce any significant effects in any country sample. Both countries' individualism and collectivism predicted a healthy personality profile when connected with horizontal focus. The results show that cultural fit could be unhealthy when the cultural dimension (e.g., vertical focus) defining fit predicts reduced well-being and aversive outcomes across individuals and societies, with implications for the subjective well-being of individuals with a migration background in adapting to a host culture such as individuals of Turkish origin in Germany or Syrian refugees in Turkey.

International Journal of PsychologyVol. 60(6)
Üsküdar University (TR), Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Cultural Differences and Values
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.