S127 How Much Fluid Is Too Much Fluid? Fluid Resuscitation in Acute Pancreatitis in Patients With History of Congestive Heart Failure

Introduction: The mainstay of treatment for acute pancreatitis was classically aggressive fluid resuscitation. Recent studies have found that moderate fluid resuscitation is superior to that of aggressive, as patients are adequately treated without the adverse effects of fluid overload. However, these studies excluded patients with history of congestive heart failure (CHF). We studied patients who presented to St. Luke’s hospitals with acute pancreatitis and history of CHF to understand differences in fluid resuscitation and complications between those who developed acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) and those who did not. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on adult patients with a history of CHF who presented to St. Luke’s hospitals from 2019 to 2025 with acute pancreatitis. 279 encounters were reviewed. Patients with stage 4 chronic kidney disease, end stage renal disease on dialysis, decompensated cirrhosis, and ADHF on presentation were excluded. Of the remaining 189 patients, we compared fluid administration, outcomes, and complications between those who developed ADHF with that of those who did not. Statistical analyses were performed with STATA software. Results: Of the 189 patients admitted with acute pancreatitis, 26.5% developed ADHF during their hospitalization. Those who developed ADHF received higher fluid boluses (mean 1.22 L vs 0.84 L; P = 0.010), had longer hospital stays (median 7 vs 4 days; P < 0.001), and had a higher incidence of moderately severe or severe pancreatitis (54% vs 19.4%; P < 0.001). Thirty-day readmission was more frequent in the ADHF group (38% vs 24.5%), approaching but not reaching statistical significance (P = 0.098). Conclusion: This analysis highlights that larger fluid bolus administration may result in the development of ADHF, which is associated with worse outcomes and longer hospital lengths of stay. Previous literature, most prominently the WATERFALL trial, has shown the harms associated with aggressive early volume resuscitation in acute pancreatitis without including heart failure patients. This study points to the adverse role of fluid boluses specifically and suggests continuous fluids may be a better choice for fluid resuscitation in this population. Optimizing fluid resuscitation in patients with known CHF may reduce the risk of decompensation and associated complications, decreasing length of stay and improving both short- and long-term outcomes. Future prospective studies should be performed to help solidify this.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001126968.93171.17
Primary Topic
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S127 How Much Fluid Is Too Much Fluid? Fluid Resuscitation in Acute Pancreatitis in Patients With History of Congestive Heart Failure

Monica Dzwonkowski, Matthew J. Record, Het Patel, Bobbye T. Cohen et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
article

S127 How Much Fluid Is Too Much Fluid? Fluid Resuscitation in Acute Pancreatitis in Patients With History of Congestive Heart Failure

Monica Dzwonkowski, Matthew J. Record, Het Patel, Bobbye T. Cohen, Nina Sanghani, S. Levine, Kimberly J. Chaput, Rana Moawad, Nishanth Eluri, Kyle Tio
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The mainstay of treatment for acute pancreatitis was classically aggressive fluid resuscitation. Recent studies have found that moderate fluid resuscitation is superior to that of aggressive, as patients are adequately treated without the adverse effects of fluid overload. However, these studies excluded patients with history of congestive heart failure (CHF). We studied patients who presented to St. Luke’s hospitals with acute pancreatitis and history of CHF to understand differences in fluid resuscitation and complications between those who developed acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) and those who did not. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on adult patients with a history of CHF who presented to St. Luke’s hospitals from 2019 to 2025 with acute pancreatitis. 279 encounters were reviewed. Patients with stage 4 chronic kidney disease, end stage renal disease on dialysis, decompensated cirrhosis, and ADHF on presentation were excluded. Of the remaining 189 patients, we compared fluid administration, outcomes, and complications between those who developed ADHF with that of those who did not. Statistical analyses were performed with STATA software. Results: Of the 189 patients admitted with acute pancreatitis, 26.5% developed ADHF during their hospitalization. Those who developed ADHF received higher fluid boluses (mean 1.22 L vs 0.84 L; P = 0.010), had longer hospital stays (median 7 vs 4 days; P < 0.001), and had a higher incidence of moderately severe or severe pancreatitis (54% vs 19.4%; P < 0.001). Thirty-day readmission was more frequent in the ADHF group (38% vs 24.5%), approaching but not reaching statistical significance (P = 0.098). Conclusion: This analysis highlights that larger fluid bolus administration may result in the development of ADHF, which is associated with worse outcomes and longer hospital lengths of stay. Previous literature, most prominently the WATERFALL trial, has shown the harms associated with aggressive early volume resuscitation in acute pancreatitis without including heart failure patients. This study points to the adverse role of fluid boluses specifically and suggests continuous fluids may be a better choice for fluid resuscitation in this population. Optimizing fluid resuscitation in patients with known CHF may reduce the risk of decompensation and associated complications, decreasing length of stay and improving both short- and long-term outcomes. Future prospective studies should be performed to help solidify this.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.