S113 Influence of Endoscopic Ultrasound Findings on Management Decisions in Patients With Incidental Pancreatic Cysts

Introduction: Although endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is frequently used to evaluate incidental pancreatic cysts, its influence on clinical decision-making and cost-effectiveness remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the frequency and nature of clinical management changes resulting from EUS findings in patients with incidental pancreatic cysts. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients who underwent EUS for incidental pancreatic cysts at Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center between 2013 and 2024. Patients with limited follow-up or participation in concurrent studies were excluded. The primary outcome was the proportion of cases in which EUS findings altered clinical management. Secondary outcomes included the type of management changes (e.g., imaging frequency, surveillance modality, surgical referral), pre-EUS diagnostics, EUS findings, cyst fluid analysis, and patient demographics. Results: A total of 209 patients were included (mean age 66 ± 13.8 years; 59.4% women). EUS altered management in 33.0% of cases. Among all patients, 64.6% continued routine imaging surveillance, and 2.4% had comorbidities that rendered EUS findings clinically irrelevant—together comprising the 67.0% with no change in management. Management changes included increased surveillance frequency (13.9%), change in surveillance modality (5.7%), both frequency and modality changes (1.4%), surveillance cessation (5.3%), and surgical referral (5.7%). A new diagnosis was established in 0.96% of cases. Conclusion: EUS led to a change in management in approximately one-third of patients, though most continued routine surveillance. These findings suggest a potentially limited role for EUS in the routine evaluation of incidental pancreatic cysts and highlight the need for multicenter studies to inform cost-effective, evidence-based surveillance strategies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001126912.84924.ff
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S113 Influence of Endoscopic Ultrasound Findings on Management Decisions in Patients With Incidental Pancreatic Cysts

Timothy B. Gardner, Alexander Seel
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

S113 Influence of Endoscopic Ultrasound Findings on Management Decisions in Patients With Incidental Pancreatic Cysts

Timothy B. Gardner, Alexander Seel
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Although endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is frequently used to evaluate incidental pancreatic cysts, its influence on clinical decision-making and cost-effectiveness remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the frequency and nature of clinical management changes resulting from EUS findings in patients with incidental pancreatic cysts. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients who underwent EUS for incidental pancreatic cysts at Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center between 2013 and 2024. Patients with limited follow-up or participation in concurrent studies were excluded. The primary outcome was the proportion of cases in which EUS findings altered clinical management. Secondary outcomes included the type of management changes (e.g., imaging frequency, surveillance modality, surgical referral), pre-EUS diagnostics, EUS findings, cyst fluid analysis, and patient demographics. Results: A total of 209 patients were included (mean age 66 ± 13.8 years; 59.4% women). EUS altered management in 33.0% of cases. Among all patients, 64.6% continued routine imaging surveillance, and 2.4% had comorbidities that rendered EUS findings clinically irrelevant—together comprising the 67.0% with no change in management. Management changes included increased surveillance frequency (13.9%), change in surveillance modality (5.7%), both frequency and modality changes (1.4%), surveillance cessation (5.3%), and surgical referral (5.7%). A new diagnosis was established in 0.96% of cases. Conclusion: EUS led to a change in management in approximately one-third of patients, though most continued routine surveillance. These findings suggest a potentially limited role for EUS in the routine evaluation of incidental pancreatic cysts and highlight the need for multicenter studies to inform cost-effective, evidence-based surveillance strategies.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

S113 Influence of Endoscopic Ultrasound Findings on Management Decisions in Patients With Incidental Pancreatic Cysts — Timothy B. Gardner, Alexander Seel · The American Journal of Gastroenterology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS