S165 Outcomes of Acute Pancreatitis in Patients With and Without C. difficile Infection: A Nationwide Study

Introduction: A significant increase has been noted in hospital admissions for patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) in the past decade. This also increases the risk of exposure to C. difficile infection (CDI). Although CDI primarily affects the colon, rising data reveal it has a significant impact on the hepatobiliary system. In this study, we aim to analyze potential clinical outcomes of CDI in patients with AP with a focus on overall resource utilization. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2020 was utilized to identify adult hospitalizations (age >18 years) with a primary diagnosis of AP. Patients were stratified into 2 groups based on the presence or absence of CDI. Propensity score matching was conducted to adjust for baseline characteristics. SAS 9.4 was used to analyze the inpatient outcomes, including inpatient mortality, length of stay, total hospital charges (THC; inflation-adjusted to 2020 USD), and utilization of critical care interventions (e.g., intubation, ICU admission). Results: Overall, 46,900 patients with AP were stratified into 2 propensity-matched groups: patients with CDI (n = 23,450, mean age 55.2 years) and without CDI (n = 23,450, mean age 53.2 years). Patients in the CDI group had significantly higher inpatient mortality (6.2% vs 2.4%, P < 0.001), longer length of stay (median 13.2 vs 5.3 days, P < 0.001), and higher THC (mean $38,789 vs $14,455, P < 0.001). CDI in AP patients was associated with a significantly higher rate of non-infectious necrosis (7.8% vs 3.76%, P < 0.001) and infectious necrosis (3.49% vs 1.08%, P < 0.001) compared to non-CDI group. Rates of pseudocyst formation (9.7% vs 6.1%, P < 0.001) and abdominal compartment syndrome (0.7% vs 0.1%, P < 0.001) were also higher in patients with CDI. Furthermore, CDI group demonstrated a higher rate of complications, including septic shock, peritonitis, septicemia, AKI, and pulmonary embolism (P < 0.001). The need for critical care interventions was relatively higher in CDI cohort, with increased rates of intubation, CVC placement, pressor support, and ICU admission (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Our findings reveal significantly poor outcomes and increased healthcare resource utilization in AP patients with CDI, underscoring the need for clinical vigilance, judicious use of antibiotics, and tailored management strategies for the vulnerable population.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001127120.61433.e3
Primary Topic
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S165 Outcomes of Acute Pancreatitis in Patients With and Without C. difficile Infection: A Nationwide Study

Bradley Confer, Karan J. Yagnik, Umang Patel, Harshit S. Khara et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
article

S165 Outcomes of Acute Pancreatitis in Patients With and Without C. difficile Infection: A Nationwide Study

Bradley Confer, Karan J. Yagnik, Umang Patel, Harshit S. Khara, Raj H. Patel, Sneh Sonaiya, Charmy Parikh, Pranav Patel
article en

Abstract

Introduction: A significant increase has been noted in hospital admissions for patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) in the past decade. This also increases the risk of exposure to C. difficile infection (CDI). Although CDI primarily affects the colon, rising data reveal it has a significant impact on the hepatobiliary system. In this study, we aim to analyze potential clinical outcomes of CDI in patients with AP with a focus on overall resource utilization. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2020 was utilized to identify adult hospitalizations (age >18 years) with a primary diagnosis of AP. Patients were stratified into 2 groups based on the presence or absence of CDI. Propensity score matching was conducted to adjust for baseline characteristics. SAS 9.4 was used to analyze the inpatient outcomes, including inpatient mortality, length of stay, total hospital charges (THC; inflation-adjusted to 2020 USD), and utilization of critical care interventions (e.g., intubation, ICU admission). Results: Overall, 46,900 patients with AP were stratified into 2 propensity-matched groups: patients with CDI (n = 23,450, mean age 55.2 years) and without CDI (n = 23,450, mean age 53.2 years). Patients in the CDI group had significantly higher inpatient mortality (6.2% vs 2.4%, P < 0.001), longer length of stay (median 13.2 vs 5.3 days, P < 0.001), and higher THC (mean $38,789 vs $14,455, P < 0.001). CDI in AP patients was associated with a significantly higher rate of non-infectious necrosis (7.8% vs 3.76%, P < 0.001) and infectious necrosis (3.49% vs 1.08%, P < 0.001) compared to non-CDI group. Rates of pseudocyst formation (9.7% vs 6.1%, P < 0.001) and abdominal compartment syndrome (0.7% vs 0.1%, P < 0.001) were also higher in patients with CDI. Furthermore, CDI group demonstrated a higher rate of complications, including septic shock, peritonitis, septicemia, AKI, and pulmonary embolism (P < 0.001). The need for critical care interventions was relatively higher in CDI cohort, with increased rates of intubation, CVC placement, pressor support, and ICU admission (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Our findings reveal significantly poor outcomes and increased healthcare resource utilization in AP patients with CDI, underscoring the need for clinical vigilance, judicious use of antibiotics, and tailored management strategies for the vulnerable population.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.