S146 Use of Novel Agent Purastat® for Post Sphincterotomy Bleeding

Introduction: Endoscopic sphincterotomy is commonly performed during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Despite being performed by expert endoscopists, endoscopic sphincterotomy is associated with adverse events such as bleeding and perforation. The incidence of post sphincterotomy bleed has been reported to be 1%-3%. PuraStat® is a new synthetic hemostatic gel being used for the prophylaxis and treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding. To date, there are no published reports on the use of PuraStat® for post sphincterotomy bleeding. We aim to report the use and outcomes of PuraStat® for post sphincterotomy bleeding. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of medical records from 2 institutions. All patients who underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy for which PuraStat® was used alongside other hemostatic methods for the treatment of post-sphincterotomy bleeding were included. The aim of this study is to report on the indication, procedural and technical parameters and efficacy and safety of PuraStat® for post-sphincterotomy hemorrhage. Results: A total of 11 patients met our inclusion criteria; 55% of patients were women and mean age was 59 years; 18% of patients had significant renal dysfunction (GFR <60) and 9% had abnormal platelets at the time of intervention; 82% of patients had intraprocedural/immediate bleeding during sphincterotomy; 18% of the patients required hospitalization due to immediate bleeding. A variety of hemostatic methods were used with 36% of the patient requiring bipolar cautery. Eighty-two percent of the patients had complete cessation of the bleeding during index procedure after PuraStat® application. None of the patients experienced recurrent (<2 weeks) bleeding after hemostatic agent use. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the efficacy of PuraStat® in the management of post-sphincterotomy bleeding and none of the patients experienced recurrent bleeding after its use. The use of this novel agent proves to be safe and efficacious when used alongside other hemostatic methods. Larger scale multicenter studies are required to further validate these findings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001127044.20019.83
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S146 Use of Novel Agent Purastat® for Post Sphincterotomy Bleeding

Bertilia Tavarez, Alexander Schlachterman, Yasi Xiao, Faisal Kamal et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
article

S146 Use of Novel Agent Purastat® for Post Sphincterotomy Bleeding

Bertilia Tavarez, Alexander Schlachterman, Yasi Xiao, Faisal Kamal, Afshin Khan, Abdul Kouanda, Donna Leet, Alana Persaud, Ashwin Venkatesh, Pedro Palacios Argueta, Anand Kumar, Thomas E. Kowalski
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Endoscopic sphincterotomy is commonly performed during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Despite being performed by expert endoscopists, endoscopic sphincterotomy is associated with adverse events such as bleeding and perforation. The incidence of post sphincterotomy bleed has been reported to be 1%-3%. PuraStat® is a new synthetic hemostatic gel being used for the prophylaxis and treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding. To date, there are no published reports on the use of PuraStat® for post sphincterotomy bleeding. We aim to report the use and outcomes of PuraStat® for post sphincterotomy bleeding. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of medical records from 2 institutions. All patients who underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy for which PuraStat® was used alongside other hemostatic methods for the treatment of post-sphincterotomy bleeding were included. The aim of this study is to report on the indication, procedural and technical parameters and efficacy and safety of PuraStat® for post-sphincterotomy hemorrhage. Results: A total of 11 patients met our inclusion criteria; 55% of patients were women and mean age was 59 years; 18% of patients had significant renal dysfunction (GFR <60) and 9% had abnormal platelets at the time of intervention; 82% of patients had intraprocedural/immediate bleeding during sphincterotomy; 18% of the patients required hospitalization due to immediate bleeding. A variety of hemostatic methods were used with 36% of the patient requiring bipolar cautery. Eighty-two percent of the patients had complete cessation of the bleeding during index procedure after PuraStat® application. None of the patients experienced recurrent (<2 weeks) bleeding after hemostatic agent use. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the efficacy of PuraStat® in the management of post-sphincterotomy bleeding and none of the patients experienced recurrent bleeding after its use. The use of this novel agent proves to be safe and efficacious when used alongside other hemostatic methods. Larger scale multicenter studies are required to further validate these findings.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.