Economics and ideology, historically and ontologically considered

Abstract In this paper, we focus on the semantics and relevance of ideology in economics. Correctly conceived, we argue, ideology is a distinct, irreplaceable category, which should not be identified, for instance, with value judgements. We want to argue that a particular notion of ideology, formulated in Lawson (2012), should be preferred to its alternatives precisely because it does render ideology a distinct and irreplaceable category. Unlike Lawson (2012), though, we present the historical origins of this notion of ideology, the roots of which can be found in Marx and Schumpeter. Moreover, rather than focusing on Lawson’s (2012) main concern—how the persistent misuse of mathematics in economics is to be rationalised—we elaborate on his essential, albeit implicit, contribution: the indispensable role of ontology in distinguishing science and ideology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cambridge Journal of Economics
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beaf047
Primary Topic
Economic Theory and Institutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Economics and ideology, historically and ontologically considered

Mário Graça Moura, Francisco Pereira
Cambridge Journal of Economics
Economic Theory and Institutions
article

Economics and ideology, historically and ontologically considered

Mário Graça Moura, Francisco Pereira
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we focus on the semantics and relevance of ideology in economics. Correctly conceived, we argue, ideology is a distinct, irreplaceable category, which should not be identified, for instance, with value judgements. We want to argue that a particular notion of ideology, formulated in Lawson (2012), should be preferred to its alternatives precisely because it does render ideology a distinct and irreplaceable category. Unlike Lawson (2012), though, we present the historical origins of this notion of ideology, the roots of which can be found in Marx and Schumpeter. Moreover, rather than focusing on Lawson’s (2012) main concern—how the persistent misuse of mathematics in economics is to be rationalised—we elaborate on his essential, albeit implicit, contribution: the indispensable role of ontology in distinguishing science and ideology.

Cambridge Journal of EconomicsVol. 49(6)
Universidade do Porto (PT), Universidade Lusófona (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Economic Theory and Institutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Economics and ideology, historically and ontologically considered — Mário Graça Moura, Francisco Pereira · Cambridge Journal of Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS