The physics of sociality: Investigating patterns of social resource distribution among the Pan species

Humans invest social resources in predictable "circles of friends," from intimate ties to acquaintances. Whether these concentric social bonding dynamics (CSBD) are uniquely human or shared with other primates is unclear. We applied the CSBD model to 24 groups of bonobos and chimpanzees (<i>N</i> = 284) to test for evolutionary continuity and potential age-related changes in social selectivity. Results show that both ape species distribute social resources in ways resembling humans, supporting shared socio-cognitive structuring within the hominoid lineage. Yet clear species differences emerged: bonobos distributed resources more evenly across group members, while chimpanzees concentrated them more selectively. Moreover, chimpanzees-but not bonobos-became increasingly selective with age, mirroring human patterns of intensified interactions with fewer partners in later life. These findings suggest that our closest living relatives structure their social networks in ways that parallel humans', while also pursuing species-specific strategies that reveal both shared evolutionary roots and divergent pathways of primate sociality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
iScience
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2025.113507
Primary Topic
Primate Behavior and Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The physics of sociality: Investigating patterns of social resource distribution among the Pan species

Daniel B. M. Haun, Edwin J. C. van Leeuwen, José A. Cuesta, Zanna Clay et al.
iScience
Primate Behavior and Ecology
article

The physics of sociality: Investigating patterns of social resource distribution among the Pan species

Daniel B. M. Haun, Edwin J. C. van Leeuwen, José A. Cuesta, Zanna Clay, Marcel Eens, Jonas R. R. Torfs, Nicky Staes, Diego Escribano, Suska Nolte, Ángel Sánchez, Jeroen M. G. Stevens, Stephanie Kordon, Jean-Pascal Guéry
article en

Abstract

Humans invest social resources in predictable "circles of friends," from intimate ties to acquaintances. Whether these concentric social bonding dynamics (CSBD) are uniquely human or shared with other primates is unclear. We applied the CSBD model to 24 groups of bonobos and chimpanzees (<i>N</i> = 284) to test for evolutionary continuity and potential age-related changes in social selectivity. Results show that both ape species distribute social resources in ways resembling humans, supporting shared socio-cognitive structuring within the hominoid lineage. Yet clear species differences emerged: bonobos distributed resources more evenly across group members, while chimpanzees concentrated them more selectively. Moreover, chimpanzees-but not bonobos-became increasingly selective with age, mirroring human patterns of intensified interactions with fewer partners in later life. These findings suggest that our closest living relatives structure their social networks in ways that parallel humans', while also pursuing species-specific strategies that reveal both shared evolutionary roots and divergent pathways of primate sociality.

iScienceVol. 28(11)
University of Antwerp (BE), Durham University (GB), Utrecht University (NL), Universidad de Zaragoza (ES), Royal Zoological Society of Antwerp (BE), Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE), Vlaamse Vereniging voor Obstetrie en Gynaecolo (BE), Fondation Vallée (FR), Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Primate Behavior and Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.