Contemporary cardiac surgery outcomes databases: Data sources, variables, and applications

Objective: Large-scale multicenter databases are foundational to observational research in cardiac surgery, enabling robust analysis of clinical outcomes, practice patterns, and population-level trends.We characterize the databases most frequently used in contemporary cardiac surgery outcomes research. Methods:We reviewed all retrospective observational studies published between January 2019 and August 2025 in 7 high-impact journals and identified 905 eligible articles utilizing 217 distinct databases.The 16 most frequently used databases were further evaluated on their specific characteristics including structure, patient coverage, clinical granularity, and follow-up. Results: The selected databases broadly included (1) clinical databases such as the Society of Thoracic Surgeons databases, European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory, and the Australia and New Zealand Fontan Registry; (2) administrative claims databases like Medicare Fee-for-Service and Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database; and (3) linkage-based sources such as the National Death Index.These databases varied in procedural detail, national coverage, follow-up, population score and data completeness.Conclusions: This study comprehensively characterized common contemporary large databases used in cardiac surgery outcomes research.A thorough understanding of databases, and how they align with specific research questions is essential to generating meaningful, generalizable clinical evidence to guide clinical practice.(JTCVS Open 2025;

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JTCVS Open
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjon.2025.10.011
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contemporary cardiac surgery outcomes databases: Data sources, variables, and applications

Katherine Candelario, Roland Assi, Asad Saulat Fatimi, Adham Ahmed et al.
JTCVS Open
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

Contemporary cardiac surgery outcomes databases: Data sources, variables, and applications

Katherine Candelario, Roland Assi, Asad Saulat Fatimi, Adham Ahmed, James Hunter Mehaffey, Irbaz Hameed, Marc Pelletier, Sedem Dankwa, Akbar Bazarbaev, Sriharsha Talapeneni
article en

Abstract

Objective: Large-scale multicenter databases are foundational to observational research in cardiac surgery, enabling robust analysis of clinical outcomes, practice patterns, and population-level trends.We characterize the databases most frequently used in contemporary cardiac surgery outcomes research. Methods:We reviewed all retrospective observational studies published between January 2019 and August 2025 in 7 high-impact journals and identified 905 eligible articles utilizing 217 distinct databases.The 16 most frequently used databases were further evaluated on their specific characteristics including structure, patient coverage, clinical granularity, and follow-up. Results: The selected databases broadly included (1) clinical databases such as the Society of Thoracic Surgeons databases, European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory, and the Australia and New Zealand Fontan Registry; (2) administrative claims databases like Medicare Fee-for-Service and Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database; and (3) linkage-based sources such as the National Death Index.These databases varied in procedural detail, national coverage, follow-up, population score and data completeness.Conclusions: This study comprehensively characterized common contemporary large databases used in cardiac surgery outcomes research.A thorough understanding of databases, and how they align with specific research questions is essential to generating meaningful, generalizable clinical evidence to guide clinical practice.(JTCVS Open 2025;

JTCVS OpenVol. 29
West Virginia University (US), Yale University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.