Unlocking bioenergy for electricity generation in Indonesia: A Resource-economic assessment

· Three bioenergy power plants were assessed using a consistent evaluation framework. · Capacity and tipping fee plays major role in the viability of MSW power plant. · Biomass and biogas power plants are sensitive to selling price and capacity. · Biomass is ideal for abundant, steady supply and low electrification ratio areas. · Biogas works in low-electrification, limited and stable supply areas. The growing demand for electrical energy in Indonesia coincides with an urgent transition from fossil fuel–based generation to renewable energy sources. Leveraging its abundant natural resources, the country holds considerable potential for bioenergy power development. However, diverse bioenergy types are deployed across multiple islands, posing logistical and policy challenges. This study evaluates the economic feasibility, environmental benefits, and policy implications of biogas, biomass, and municipal solid waste (MSW) power plants, with a focus on resource availability across different regions. Results indicate that biogas and biomass systems are particularly suitable for low-electrification areas with stable feedstock supply, delivering levelized costs of electricity (LCOE) of 0.045 USD/kWh and 0.061 USD/kWh, respectively, comparable to fossil-based generation. In contrast, MSW power plants, with an LCOE of 0.113 USD/kWh, require cost-efficient technologies and are best deployed in urban centers, where tipping fees play a pivotal role in competitiveness. All three technologies demonstrate substantial potential to reduce emissions relative to coal-fired plants. Nonetheless, fragmented policies, uneven feedstock distribution, and inadequate infrastructure continue to impede the translation of theoretical resource potential into viable project deployment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Futures
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101456
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Energy and Environment Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unlocking bioenergy for electricity generation in Indonesia: A Resource-economic assessment

Visang Fardha Sukma Insani, Anna Maria Sri Asih, Teguh Ariyanto, Dani Irianto et al.
1 citations
Sustainable Futures
Energy and Environment Impacts
0.50
article

Unlocking bioenergy for electricity generation in Indonesia: A Resource-economic assessment

Visang Fardha Sukma Insani, Anna Maria Sri Asih, Teguh Ariyanto, Dani Irianto, Bagus Adjie Prasetyo, Kartika Raras Hadiyati, Muthi Amalia Rachmadani
article en
1 citations

Abstract

· Three bioenergy power plants were assessed using a consistent evaluation framework. · Capacity and tipping fee plays major role in the viability of MSW power plant. · Biomass and biogas power plants are sensitive to selling price and capacity. · Biomass is ideal for abundant, steady supply and low electrification ratio areas. · Biogas works in low-electrification, limited and stable supply areas. The growing demand for electrical energy in Indonesia coincides with an urgent transition from fossil fuel–based generation to renewable energy sources. Leveraging its abundant natural resources, the country holds considerable potential for bioenergy power development. However, diverse bioenergy types are deployed across multiple islands, posing logistical and policy challenges. This study evaluates the economic feasibility, environmental benefits, and policy implications of biogas, biomass, and municipal solid waste (MSW) power plants, with a focus on resource availability across different regions. Results indicate that biogas and biomass systems are particularly suitable for low-electrification areas with stable feedstock supply, delivering levelized costs of electricity (LCOE) of 0.045 USD/kWh and 0.061 USD/kWh, respectively, comparable to fossil-based generation. In contrast, MSW power plants, with an LCOE of 0.113 USD/kWh, require cost-efficient technologies and are best deployed in urban centers, where tipping fees play a pivotal role in competitiveness. All three technologies demonstrate substantial potential to reduce emissions relative to coal-fired plants. Nonetheless, fragmented policies, uneven feedstock distribution, and inadequate infrastructure continue to impede the translation of theoretical resource potential into viable project deployment.

Sustainable FuturesVol. 10
Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Energy and Environment Impacts
0.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.