Exploring STEM educators’ perspectives on the integration of AI-enabled technologies in teaching and learning

• New insights from STEM educators about the integration of AI into classrooms. • Educators recognize AI as an ‘affective’ tool enhancing teacher-student relationships. • AI supports students’ grasp of complex disciplinary content as a cognitive scaffold. • Insights were presented on human interaction-centered AI-enhanced pedagogy. • Structured, discipline-specific AI training was suggested. The innovation and proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are transforming Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) disciplines and pedagogical practices, making it essential to prepare educators for this evolving landscape. This qualitative study explores STEM educators’ perceptions of how they developed proficiency with AI-enabled technologies, what motivated their adoption, and the challenges they faced in classroom integration. Using a cross-sectional survey design, we collected open-ended responses from 27 in-service secondary STEM educators in the United States and analyzed the data through the reflexive thematic analysis. Our findings revealed that STEM educators recognized AI as a cognitive scaffold that can support student understanding of complex content and a socio-affective tool that can help enhance teacher–student relationships. The participants highlighted that by streamlining routine tasks, AI allowed them to reclaim time for meaningful student interactions and responsive instruction. The participants also reported developing their AI proficiency through self-directed learning, peer support, and professional networks, driven by motivations to enhance instructional efficiency, support personalized learning, and prepare students for AI-driven futures. However, the participants emphasized several significant challenges, including lack of institutional support, the overwhelming abundance of AI tools, concerns about affordability, and students’ growing overreliance on AI systems. These insights highlight the need for structured, discipline-specific professional development for in-service educators to promote effective and human-centered integration of AI in STEM education. This study contributes to a growing body of research by centering STEM educators’ perspectives and offering novel insights into how to support their effective integration of AI technologies into STEM teaching and learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers and Education Open
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100304
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring STEM educators’ perspectives on the integration of AI-enabled technologies in teaching and learning

Zahra Hazari, Stephanie Lunn, Hulya Avci
1 citations
Computers and Education Open
Online Learning and Analytics
1.69
article

Exploring STEM educators’ perspectives on the integration of AI-enabled technologies in teaching and learning

Zahra Hazari, Stephanie Lunn, Hulya Avci
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• New insights from STEM educators about the integration of AI into classrooms. • Educators recognize AI as an ‘affective’ tool enhancing teacher-student relationships. • AI supports students’ grasp of complex disciplinary content as a cognitive scaffold. • Insights were presented on human interaction-centered AI-enhanced pedagogy. • Structured, discipline-specific AI training was suggested. The innovation and proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are transforming Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) disciplines and pedagogical practices, making it essential to prepare educators for this evolving landscape. This qualitative study explores STEM educators’ perceptions of how they developed proficiency with AI-enabled technologies, what motivated their adoption, and the challenges they faced in classroom integration. Using a cross-sectional survey design, we collected open-ended responses from 27 in-service secondary STEM educators in the United States and analyzed the data through the reflexive thematic analysis. Our findings revealed that STEM educators recognized AI as a cognitive scaffold that can support student understanding of complex content and a socio-affective tool that can help enhance teacher–student relationships. The participants highlighted that by streamlining routine tasks, AI allowed them to reclaim time for meaningful student interactions and responsive instruction. The participants also reported developing their AI proficiency through self-directed learning, peer support, and professional networks, driven by motivations to enhance instructional efficiency, support personalized learning, and prepare students for AI-driven futures. However, the participants emphasized several significant challenges, including lack of institutional support, the overwhelming abundance of AI tools, concerns about affordability, and students’ growing overreliance on AI systems. These insights highlight the need for structured, discipline-specific professional development for in-service educators to promote effective and human-centered integration of AI in STEM education. This study contributes to a growing body of research by centering STEM educators’ perspectives and offering novel insights into how to support their effective integration of AI technologies into STEM teaching and learning.

Computers and Education OpenVol. 9
Florida International University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Online Learning and Analytics
1.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.