Optimized strength predictions for 3D printed fiber-reinforced concrete: Machine learning-driven insights

3D printed concrete (3DPC) has reshaped the building industry by producing intricate, tailored, and quick constructions in recent years. However, due to the complex interactions between the concrete's individual components, determining the compressive strength (CS) and flexural strength (FS) of 3D printed fiber-reinforced concrete (3DP-FRC) is challenging. The present study predicts the CS and FS using Soft Computing and Machine Learning (ML) models. Gene Expression Programming (GEP), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), and Gradient Boosting (GB) were the predictive ML models that were employed. This analysis extends to measuring accuracy and interpretability, thus combining multi-model comparative ML analysis with GEP-based sensitivity analysis and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP)-based interpretability into a single framework. The GB model was the most accurate in predicting CS, with mean absolute errors (MAE) and root mean square errors (RMSE) of 6.21 MPa and 7.83 MPa in the training stage, and 7.03 MPa and 8.84 MPa in the testing stage, respectively. The coefficients of determination ( R 2 ) remained above 0.92. For FS, the GB model again outperformed other models, yielding MAEs and RMSEs of 1.81 MPa and 2.18 MPa in training and 2.21 MPa and 2.18 MPa in evaluation, respectively, with R 2 higher than 0.94. The second-best models were those from GEP, which achieved nearly equal accuracy and, moreover, produced explicit symbolic regression equations that can be used directly in engineering without requiring retraining. According to the sensitivity and SHAP analyses, the parameters most influential on CS were fiber volume fraction ( F volf ), water/binder ratio ( W / B ), and silica fume content (SF). For FS, F volf , W / B , and fly ash content (FA) were the dominant parameters. These results demonstrated the intricate relationships between mix design parameters and mechanical responses, providing an engineering-transparent, data-driven approach for optimizing 3DP-FRC mixtures. Among the early studies that integrate SHAP interpretability with multi-model ML benchmarking and GEP symbolic regression for 3DP-FRC, this work aims to fill the gap between accuracy and practicality with an approach that empowers engineers to design optimized mixes that satisfy determinate strength requirements, taking into account material and process variability. The acquired knowledge thus directs the path toward establishing protocols for quality control, enhanced performance prediction of structures, and ultimately, the faster implementation of 3DP-FRC into sustainable construction applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Structures
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2025.110400
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimized strength predictions for 3D printed fiber-reinforced concrete: Machine learning-driven insights

Bashar Ismael, Malek Mohammad, Asad S. Albostami, Rwayda Kh. S. Al‐Hamd
1 citations
Structures
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
1.01
article

Optimized strength predictions for 3D printed fiber-reinforced concrete: Machine learning-driven insights

Bashar Ismael, Malek Mohammad, Asad S. Albostami, Rwayda Kh. S. Al‐Hamd
article en
1 citations

Abstract

3D printed concrete (3DPC) has reshaped the building industry by producing intricate, tailored, and quick constructions in recent years. However, due to the complex interactions between the concrete's individual components, determining the compressive strength (CS) and flexural strength (FS) of 3D printed fiber-reinforced concrete (3DP-FRC) is challenging. The present study predicts the CS and FS using Soft Computing and Machine Learning (ML) models. Gene Expression Programming (GEP), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), and Gradient Boosting (GB) were the predictive ML models that were employed. This analysis extends to measuring accuracy and interpretability, thus combining multi-model comparative ML analysis with GEP-based sensitivity analysis and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP)-based interpretability into a single framework. The GB model was the most accurate in predicting CS, with mean absolute errors (MAE) and root mean square errors (RMSE) of 6.21 MPa and 7.83 MPa in the training stage, and 7.03 MPa and 8.84 MPa in the testing stage, respectively. The coefficients of determination ( R 2 ) remained above 0.92. For FS, the GB model again outperformed other models, yielding MAEs and RMSEs of 1.81 MPa and 2.18 MPa in training and 2.21 MPa and 2.18 MPa in evaluation, respectively, with R 2 higher than 0.94. The second-best models were those from GEP, which achieved nearly equal accuracy and, moreover, produced explicit symbolic regression equations that can be used directly in engineering without requiring retraining. According to the sensitivity and SHAP analyses, the parameters most influential on CS were fiber volume fraction ( F volf ), water/binder ratio ( W / B ), and silica fume content (SF). For FS, F volf , W / B , and fly ash content (FA) were the dominant parameters. These results demonstrated the intricate relationships between mix design parameters and mechanical responses, providing an engineering-transparent, data-driven approach for optimizing 3DP-FRC mixtures. Among the early studies that integrate SHAP interpretability with multi-model ML benchmarking and GEP symbolic regression for 3DP-FRC, this work aims to fill the gap between accuracy and practicality with an approach that empowers engineers to design optimized mixes that satisfy determinate strength requirements, taking into account material and process variability. The acquired knowledge thus directs the path toward establishing protocols for quality control, enhanced performance prediction of structures, and ultimately, the faster implementation of 3DP-FRC into sustainable construction applications.

StructuresVol. 82
University of Manchester (GB), University Of Fallujah (IQ), Manchester School of Architecture (GB), Liverpool John Moores University (GB), Abertay University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.