Fuel cell and electric vehicles: Resource use and associated environmental impacts

Achieving transport decarbonization depends on electric vehicle (EV) and fuel cell vehicle (FCV) deployment, yet their material demands and impacts vary by vehicle type. This study explores how powertrain preferences in light-duty vehicles (LDVs) and heavy-duty vehicles (HDVs) shape future resource use and material-related environmental outcomes. Using dynamic material flow analysis and prospective life cycle assessment, we assess three scenarios. In the S3 EV-dominant scenario, 2050 lithium and cobalt demand rises by up to 11.9-fold and 1.8-fold relative to 2020, with higher global warming and human toxicity impacts. The S2 FCV-dominant scenario leads to a 21.7-fold increase in platinum-group metal demand, driving up freshwater ecotoxicity and particulate emissions. A balanced S1 scenario, EVs in LDVs and FCVs in HDVs, yields moderate material demand and environmental burdens. These findings demonstrate that no single pathway can fully resolve material-related impacts, while combining EVs and FCVs across LDVs and HDVs enables a more balanced and sustainable transition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108646
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fuel cell and electric vehicles: Resource use and associated environmental impacts

René Kleijn, Hai Xiang Lin, Chunbo Zhang, Zhenyang Chen
1 citations
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
0.68
article

Fuel cell and electric vehicles: Resource use and associated environmental impacts

René Kleijn, Hai Xiang Lin, Chunbo Zhang, Zhenyang Chen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Achieving transport decarbonization depends on electric vehicle (EV) and fuel cell vehicle (FCV) deployment, yet their material demands and impacts vary by vehicle type. This study explores how powertrain preferences in light-duty vehicles (LDVs) and heavy-duty vehicles (HDVs) shape future resource use and material-related environmental outcomes. Using dynamic material flow analysis and prospective life cycle assessment, we assess three scenarios. In the S3 EV-dominant scenario, 2050 lithium and cobalt demand rises by up to 11.9-fold and 1.8-fold relative to 2020, with higher global warming and human toxicity impacts. The S2 FCV-dominant scenario leads to a 21.7-fold increase in platinum-group metal demand, driving up freshwater ecotoxicity and particulate emissions. A balanced S1 scenario, EVs in LDVs and FCVs in HDVs, yields moderate material demand and environmental burdens. These findings demonstrate that no single pathway can fully resolve material-related impacts, while combining EVs and FCVs across LDVs and HDVs enables a more balanced and sustainable transition.

Resources Conservation and RecyclingVol. 226
Leiden University (NL), University College London (GB), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
0.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.