Biofuel technologies and global decarbonization by 2050: The role of technological learning, spillovers effects and feedstock constraints

By 2023, bioenergy represented an important energy resource, accounting for approximately 10.81 % of global final energy consumption, or about 42 EJ/y. Of this value, around 35 EJ/y came from modern bioenergy, primarily modern solid biomass, while liquid biofuels contributed only 3.8 EJ/y. To support their net zero ambitions by 2050, several governments have set targets to increase the production of advanced biofuels, which utilize non-agricultural feedstocks, hence mitigating the environmental impacts of conventional biofuels. However, the deployment of these technologies faces several challenges due to high production costs and limited feedstock availability, creating uncertainty around the viability of these targets. This research develops a global integrated assessment model that incorporates learning curves and technological spillover effects for biofuel technologies calibrated using patent data. The model evaluates mid-century biofuel production across three scenarios, each varying in land resource availability and feedstock constraints, to provide insights about the effects of climate policy induced technological change. The scenarios are defined based on current literature exploring crop yields, land availability and food security, as well as residual feedstocks for advanced biofuels. Results show that climate induced damages can reduce conventional biofuels output almost by 6.004 EJ throughout the entire simulation period. Alternatively, it is found that across all scenarios advanced biofuels production remains below the technical potential found in most literature, and that when spillover effects are accounted for, a reduction of 7.13–13.7 % in the costs of advanced biofuels energy supply is achieved by 2050 across all scenarios. • Advanced biofuel (AB) technologies seem to be moderately related to each other. • Climate change driven land degradation and reduced crop yields lower 1G biofuel production across scenarios, resulting in an average 6 EJ decrease between the opt and pes scenarios by 2050. • By 2050, biofuels contribute at best 14.4 EJ/y to TES, with 1G providing 2.95–3.7 EJ/y and 2G contributing 5.2–10.7 EJ/y.. • Production of AB in all scenarios with carbon tax remains below the lower estimates for aggregate biomass technical potential. • Spillover effects can create a reduction of 7.13 % to 13.7 % in the costs of AB in the total energy supply by 2050.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Strategy Reviews
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2025.101932
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biofuel technologies and global decarbonization by 2050: The role of technological learning, spillovers effects and feedstock constraints

Jesus Alberto Mercado Cordova
1 citations
Energy Strategy Reviews
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
0.36
article

Biofuel technologies and global decarbonization by 2050: The role of technological learning, spillovers effects and feedstock constraints

Jesus Alberto Mercado Cordova
article en
1 citations

Abstract

By 2023, bioenergy represented an important energy resource, accounting for approximately 10.81 % of global final energy consumption, or about 42 EJ/y. Of this value, around 35 EJ/y came from modern bioenergy, primarily modern solid biomass, while liquid biofuels contributed only 3.8 EJ/y. To support their net zero ambitions by 2050, several governments have set targets to increase the production of advanced biofuels, which utilize non-agricultural feedstocks, hence mitigating the environmental impacts of conventional biofuels. However, the deployment of these technologies faces several challenges due to high production costs and limited feedstock availability, creating uncertainty around the viability of these targets. This research develops a global integrated assessment model that incorporates learning curves and technological spillover effects for biofuel technologies calibrated using patent data. The model evaluates mid-century biofuel production across three scenarios, each varying in land resource availability and feedstock constraints, to provide insights about the effects of climate policy induced technological change. The scenarios are defined based on current literature exploring crop yields, land availability and food security, as well as residual feedstocks for advanced biofuels. Results show that climate induced damages can reduce conventional biofuels output almost by 6.004 EJ throughout the entire simulation period. Alternatively, it is found that across all scenarios advanced biofuels production remains below the technical potential found in most literature, and that when spillover effects are accounted for, a reduction of 7.13–13.7 % in the costs of advanced biofuels energy supply is achieved by 2050 across all scenarios. • Advanced biofuel (AB) technologies seem to be moderately related to each other. • Climate change driven land degradation and reduced crop yields lower 1G biofuel production across scenarios, resulting in an average 6 EJ decrease between the opt and pes scenarios by 2050. • By 2050, biofuels contribute at best 14.4 EJ/y to TES, with 1G providing 2.95–3.7 EJ/y and 2G contributing 5.2–10.7 EJ/y.. • Production of AB in all scenarios with carbon tax remains below the lower estimates for aggregate biomass technical potential. • Spillover effects can create a reduction of 7.13 % to 13.7 % in the costs of AB in the total energy supply by 2050.

Energy Strategy ReviewsVol. 62
Institut Mines-Télécom (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), CEA Paris-Saclay - Etablissement de Saclay (FR), Université d'Évry Val-d'Essonne (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
0.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.