A Medieval Derelict Jihad Canon: Ibn Taymiyya’s Qāʿida muḫtaṣara fī qitāl al-kuffār on Combating Non-Believers

Abstract The Qāʿida muḫtaṣara fī qitāl al-kuffār: Hal sababuhu l-muqātala aw l-kufr? ( QM ), one of the less known epitomes of Ibn Taymiyya’s treatises, is notably important as a summarized gloss of his take on unbelief ( kufr ) as the mere ratio legis to fight or kill non-Muslims. Though its authenticity can be claimed, the disagreements are less about its attribution to Ibn Taymiyya and more about its content that sparked controversy about a crucial issue at the core of the jihad discourse. Examples of the challenging discrepancies of contested texts on the issue of offensive/initiatory jihad ( ǧihād al-ṭalab/al-ibtidāʾ ), spread over Ibn Taymiyya’s large corpus, may offer contradictive perspectives. The analysis and discussion of this treatise, compared to his extant legacy, shows how Ibn Taymiyya does not categorically refute initiating jihad against non-Muslims. He rather stresses a conceptualization of defensive jihad ( ǧihād al-dafʿ ) as the basic legitimate rule, even when initiating ( ibtidāʾ ) a fight is necessary as a preventive anticipatory measure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studia Islamica
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/19585705-12341513
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Medieval Derelict Jihad Canon: Ibn Taymiyya’s Qāʿida muḫtaṣara fī qitāl al-kuffār on Combating Non-Believers

Y.A.I.A. Ellethy
Studia Islamica
Islamic Studies and History
article

A Medieval Derelict Jihad Canon: Ibn Taymiyya’s Qāʿida muḫtaṣara fī qitāl al-kuffār on Combating Non-Believers

Y.A.I.A. Ellethy
article en

Abstract

Abstract The Qāʿida muḫtaṣara fī qitāl al-kuffār: Hal sababuhu l-muqātala aw l-kufr? ( QM ), one of the less known epitomes of Ibn Taymiyya’s treatises, is notably important as a summarized gloss of his take on unbelief ( kufr ) as the mere ratio legis to fight or kill non-Muslims. Though its authenticity can be claimed, the disagreements are less about its attribution to Ibn Taymiyya and more about its content that sparked controversy about a crucial issue at the core of the jihad discourse. Examples of the challenging discrepancies of contested texts on the issue of offensive/initiatory jihad ( ǧihād al-ṭalab/al-ibtidāʾ ), spread over Ibn Taymiyya’s large corpus, may offer contradictive perspectives. The analysis and discussion of this treatise, compared to his extant legacy, shows how Ibn Taymiyya does not categorically refute initiating jihad against non-Muslims. He rather stresses a conceptualization of defensive jihad ( ǧihād al-dafʿ ) as the basic legitimate rule, even when initiating ( ibtidāʾ ) a fight is necessary as a preventive anticipatory measure.

Studia IslamicaVol. 120(2)
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Islamic Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.