In search of a conditioned place preference test for mice to assess the severity of experimental procedures

Abstract To compare the severity of experimental procedures and behavioural tests from an animal’s perspective, novel methods are required. Theoretically, one feasible approach could be the use of a conditioned place preference test (CPP). This test employs the preference for a certain area in a test apparatus being associated with an experimental treatment. Traditionally, the CPP is used to investigate, for example, the effects of drugs. Instead, we aimed to develop a protocol that would enable us to compare the effects of different experimental procedures conducted with mice. Nine experiments with C57BL/6J mice were performed, varying the setup, the procedure duration, the stimuli as well as the presentation order. None of the tested protocols resulted in a distinct preference. Moreover, even simple protocols using food reward as a treatment failed to result in a conditioned place preference. In summary, none of the protocols was sufficient to form a reliable association between conditioned and unconditioned stimulus. We have scrutinized the experimental setup in detail, and we cannot present a solution yet. However, hopefully, our findings will help to create a working CPP to compare the severity of different experimental procedures for mice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behaviour
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539x-bja10332
Primary Topic
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In search of a conditioned place preference test for mice to assess the severity of experimental procedures

Pia Kahnau, Anne Jaap, Lars Lewejohann
Behaviour
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
article

In search of a conditioned place preference test for mice to assess the severity of experimental procedures

Pia Kahnau, Anne Jaap, Lars Lewejohann
article en

Abstract

Abstract To compare the severity of experimental procedures and behavioural tests from an animal’s perspective, novel methods are required. Theoretically, one feasible approach could be the use of a conditioned place preference test (CPP). This test employs the preference for a certain area in a test apparatus being associated with an experimental treatment. Traditionally, the CPP is used to investigate, for example, the effects of drugs. Instead, we aimed to develop a protocol that would enable us to compare the effects of different experimental procedures conducted with mice. Nine experiments with C57BL/6J mice were performed, varying the setup, the procedure duration, the stimuli as well as the presentation order. None of the tested protocols resulted in a distinct preference. Moreover, even simple protocols using food reward as a treatment failed to result in a conditioned place preference. In summary, none of the protocols was sufficient to form a reliable association between conditioned and unconditioned stimulus. We have scrutinized the experimental setup in detail, and we cannot present a solution yet. However, hopefully, our findings will help to create a working CPP to compare the severity of different experimental procedures for mice.

BehaviourVol. 162(13-14)
Animal Welfare Institute (US), Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.