Quantum geometric bounds for observables: Linear responses, Drude weight, and orbital magnetization

The quantum geometric tensor (QGT) provides nontrivial bounds among physical quantities, as exemplified by the metric curvature inequality. How far can this idea be generalized, and what other observables obey such quantum-geometric constraints? The authors show here that generalized QGTs yield new inequalities among all linear responses, the Drude weight, and the orbital magnetization. They further find that this Drude orbital magnetization inequality approaches equality as bands become flatter, which is nearly satisfied in the experimentally observed orbital magnetization of twisted bilayer graphene.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. B./Physical review. B
Published
2025-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/qxbl-qd4f
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Topological Materials and Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantum geometric bounds for observables: Linear responses, Drude weight, and orbital magnetization

Naoto Nagaosa, Koki Shinada
2 citations
Physical review. B./Physical review. B
Topological Materials and Phenomena
2.49
article

Quantum geometric bounds for observables: Linear responses, Drude weight, and orbital magnetization

Naoto Nagaosa, Koki Shinada
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The quantum geometric tensor (QGT) provides nontrivial bounds among physical quantities, as exemplified by the metric curvature inequality. How far can this idea be generalized, and what other observables obey such quantum-geometric constraints? The authors show here that generalized QGTs yield new inequalities among all linear responses, the Drude weight, and the orbital magnetization. They further find that this Drude orbital magnetization inequality approaches equality as bands become flatter, which is nearly satisfied in the experimentally observed orbital magnetization of twisted bilayer graphene.

Physical review. B./Physical review. BVol. 112(15)
RIKEN (JP), RIKEN Center for Emergent Matter Science (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Topological Materials and Phenomena
2.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.