Swenson-like full-thickness versus endorectal pull-through procedures for rectosigmoid Hirschsprung disease: Ten-year experiences from a tertiary center in China and mid-term functional outcomes

The Swenson-like full-thickness pull-through procedure has been successfully adopted to treat Hirschsprung disease (HSCR). However, extensive studies on the postoperative bowel and urinary function after this procedure are limited. This study shares our experience and compares the functional outcomes with the endorectal pull-through procedure. We retrospectively analyzed 311 children with rectosigmoid HSCR from January 2010 to December 2020. Medical and follow-up data were reviewed. Bowel function was assessed using the Bowel Function Score (BFS), and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) were recorded. Of the 311 patients, 60 underwent laparoscopic Swenson-like pull-through (LSwPT), 61 underwent laparoscopic endorectal pull-through (LERPT), 93 underwent total transanal Swenson-like pull-through (TSwPT), and 97 underwent total transanal endorectal pull-through (TERPT). Clinical characteristics and early postoperative complications were similar between the Swenson-like and endorectal groups, but the Swenson-like procedures had significantly shorter operative time. No significant differences were found in postoperative obstructive symptoms, constipation, or soiling issues between the Swenson-like and endorectal groups. The TSwPT group had a significantly lower rate of postoperative HAEC than the TERPT group, but this was not the case for the LSwPT and LERPT groups. Patients in the Swenson-like groups experienced fewer annual HAEC episodes than those in the endorectal groups. The results from BFS showed no statistical difference between these groups. The overall LUTS profiles were comparable for all symptoms. The Swenson-like full-thickness pull-through technique is safe and feasible. Compared with the endorectal pull-through procedure, it shortens the operative time and might have advantages in preventing postoperative HAEC. III.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Surgery
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2025.08.045
Primary Topic
Congenital gastrointestinal and neural anomalies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Swenson-like full-thickness versus endorectal pull-through procedures for rectosigmoid Hirschsprung disease: Ten-year experiences from a tertiary center in China and mid-term functional outcomes

Ying Zhou, Minzhong Zhang, Weihua Pan, Jun Wang
Asian Journal of Surgery
Congenital gastrointestinal and neural anomalies
article

Swenson-like full-thickness versus endorectal pull-through procedures for rectosigmoid Hirschsprung disease: Ten-year experiences from a tertiary center in China and mid-term functional outcomes

Ying Zhou, Minzhong Zhang, Weihua Pan, Jun Wang
article en

Abstract

The Swenson-like full-thickness pull-through procedure has been successfully adopted to treat Hirschsprung disease (HSCR). However, extensive studies on the postoperative bowel and urinary function after this procedure are limited. This study shares our experience and compares the functional outcomes with the endorectal pull-through procedure. We retrospectively analyzed 311 children with rectosigmoid HSCR from January 2010 to December 2020. Medical and follow-up data were reviewed. Bowel function was assessed using the Bowel Function Score (BFS), and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) were recorded. Of the 311 patients, 60 underwent laparoscopic Swenson-like pull-through (LSwPT), 61 underwent laparoscopic endorectal pull-through (LERPT), 93 underwent total transanal Swenson-like pull-through (TSwPT), and 97 underwent total transanal endorectal pull-through (TERPT). Clinical characteristics and early postoperative complications were similar between the Swenson-like and endorectal groups, but the Swenson-like procedures had significantly shorter operative time. No significant differences were found in postoperative obstructive symptoms, constipation, or soiling issues between the Swenson-like and endorectal groups. The TSwPT group had a significantly lower rate of postoperative HAEC than the TERPT group, but this was not the case for the LSwPT and LERPT groups. Patients in the Swenson-like groups experienced fewer annual HAEC episodes than those in the endorectal groups. The results from BFS showed no statistical difference between these groups. The overall LUTS profiles were comparable for all symptoms. The Swenson-like full-thickness pull-through technique is safe and feasible. Compared with the endorectal pull-through procedure, it shortens the operative time and might have advantages in preventing postoperative HAEC. III.

Asian Journal of SurgeryVol. 49(1)
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), XinHua Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Congenital gastrointestinal and neural anomalies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.