Experiences of ESL students and instructors using Grammarly in academic writing

Incorporating artificial intelligence writing assistants (AIWAs) into academic writing provides opportunities to improve higher educational formative assessment. The current study seeks to examine the effectiveness of Grammarly, an AI writing assistant (AIWA), in providing instantaneous and personalised feedback to English as a second language (ESL) graduate students. The data were collected through semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with 30 graduate students and five writing instructors with more than three years of teaching experience in graduate writing at a Malaysian public university. The results demonstrated that Grammarly enhanced student motivation, engagement, and writing proficiency through constant and detailed feedback compared to conventional approaches with time constraints and high subjectivity. However, the findings also highlighted limitations in the variety of feedback provided by Grammarly particularly in addressing nuanced academic writing needs and tailoring suggestions for complex content. Furthermore, Grammarly can support self-regulated learning while decreasing writing anxiety. This finding contributes to the ongoing discourse on AI incorporation in education and employing a balanced method in incorporating AI feedback with human oversights. This limitation underscores the importance of using Grammarly as a complementary tool rather than a standalone solution. Summarily, incorporating AIWAs responsibly can assist in providing a more conducive learning context for students’ future academic and professional endeavours.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in English Language and Education
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v12i3.40518
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experiences of ESL students and instructors using Grammarly in academic writing

Yueh Yea Lo
Studies in English Language and Education
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

Experiences of ESL students and instructors using Grammarly in academic writing

Yueh Yea Lo
article en

Abstract

Incorporating artificial intelligence writing assistants (AIWAs) into academic writing provides opportunities to improve higher educational formative assessment. The current study seeks to examine the effectiveness of Grammarly, an AI writing assistant (AIWA), in providing instantaneous and personalised feedback to English as a second language (ESL) graduate students. The data were collected through semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with 30 graduate students and five writing instructors with more than three years of teaching experience in graduate writing at a Malaysian public university. The results demonstrated that Grammarly enhanced student motivation, engagement, and writing proficiency through constant and detailed feedback compared to conventional approaches with time constraints and high subjectivity. However, the findings also highlighted limitations in the variety of feedback provided by Grammarly particularly in addressing nuanced academic writing needs and tailoring suggestions for complex content. Furthermore, Grammarly can support self-regulated learning while decreasing writing anxiety. This finding contributes to the ongoing discourse on AI incorporation in education and employing a balanced method in incorporating AI feedback with human oversights. This limitation underscores the importance of using Grammarly as a complementary tool rather than a standalone solution. Summarily, incorporating AIWAs responsibly can assist in providing a more conducive learning context for students’ future academic and professional endeavours.

Studies in English Language and EducationVol. 12(3)
University of Malaya (MY)
Abu Dhabi Education Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.