Comparing the effectiveness of multimodal vs monomodal digital flashcards for L2 vocabulary learning

This applied psycholinguistics study explores whether multimodal flashcards (containing text, audio, and a picture) are more effective than monomodal flashcards (containing text only) as a tool for learning the meanings of novel second-language (L2) concrete nouns. The research instrument was Anki, a flashcard application that utilises active recall and spaced repetition. The study used a within-subject design, where each participant (n = 25) studied a total of 30 L2-L1 (Esperanto–Indonesian) word pairs over the course of seven study sessions utilising an assortment of 15 multimodal and 15 monomodal flashcards, with each word pair being presented multimodally to approximately half of the participants and monomodally to the other half. When (re)viewing the answer side of a card, participants were instructed to tap ‘Good’ if they recalled the answer correctly or ‘Again’ if not. Recall accuracy data for the two card types were collected and then analysed using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test, which indicated that the number of user-initiated reviews (‘Again’ count, which is indicative of the number of memory lapses) was significantly higher for monomodal flashcards (Mdn = 61, n = 25) than for multimodal flashcards (Mdn = 50, n = 25), Z = -3.4, p 0.001, r = -0.7. These results support the hypothesis that multimodal flashcards are more effective than monomodal flashcards as a tool for learning the meanings of L2 concrete nouns. By implication, language learners can enhance their recall accuracy of L2 concrete nouns by creating and using flashcards that utilise multiple semantically congruent modes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in English Language and Education
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v12i3.39630
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing the effectiveness of multimodal vs monomodal digital flashcards for L2 vocabulary learning

Rina Marnita, J. Kevin Hicks, Oktavianus Oktavianus
1 citations
Studies in English Language and Education
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
3.44
article

Comparing the effectiveness of multimodal vs monomodal digital flashcards for L2 vocabulary learning

Rina Marnita, J. Kevin Hicks, Oktavianus Oktavianus
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This applied psycholinguistics study explores whether multimodal flashcards (containing text, audio, and a picture) are more effective than monomodal flashcards (containing text only) as a tool for learning the meanings of novel second-language (L2) concrete nouns. The research instrument was Anki, a flashcard application that utilises active recall and spaced repetition. The study used a within-subject design, where each participant (n = 25) studied a total of 30 L2-L1 (Esperanto–Indonesian) word pairs over the course of seven study sessions utilising an assortment of 15 multimodal and 15 monomodal flashcards, with each word pair being presented multimodally to approximately half of the participants and monomodally to the other half. When (re)viewing the answer side of a card, participants were instructed to tap ‘Good’ if they recalled the answer correctly or ‘Again’ if not. Recall accuracy data for the two card types were collected and then analysed using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test, which indicated that the number of user-initiated reviews (‘Again’ count, which is indicative of the number of memory lapses) was significantly higher for monomodal flashcards (Mdn = 61, n = 25) than for multimodal flashcards (Mdn = 50, n = 25), Z = -3.4, p 0.001, r = -0.7. These results support the hypothesis that multimodal flashcards are more effective than monomodal flashcards as a tool for learning the meanings of L2 concrete nouns. By implication, language learners can enhance their recall accuracy of L2 concrete nouns by creating and using flashcards that utilise multiple semantically congruent modes.

Studies in English Language and EducationVol. 12(3)
Andalas University (ID)
Universitas Andalas
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.