Exploring reading self-efficacy among EFL learners from different academic disciplines

Reading self-efficacy plays a crucial role in the academic success of EFL learners, yet the extent to which it varies across academic disciplines remains underexplored. This study aims to (1) examine the level of reading self-efficacy among EFL learners from business, social sciences, and sciences; (2) investigate the relationship between different components of reading self-efficacy; and (3) compare self-efficacy levels across these academic disciplines. A total of 217 university-level EFL students in Thailand participated in the study. A 25-item reading self-efficacy questionnaire with strong reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.915) was employed. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, and ANOVA. The results reveal significant positive correlations between assessment of content (AOC) and summary of content (SOC) (r = 0.522, p 0.001), and between opinion on content (OOC) and SOC (r = 0.387, p 0.001). ANOVA results indicate significant differences in recognition of content elements (ROE) across disciplines, with business students scoring higher than science students (p = 0.015). Business students also demonstrated significantly higher self-efficacy in OOC compared to social science and science students (p = 0.001). These findings suggest that reading self-efficacy is influenced by students’ academic disciplines, supporting the view that self-efficacy is task-specific and context-dependent. Therefore, EFL instructors should implement tailored instructional approaches that address discipline-specific reading challenges to enhance students’ reading confidence and academic performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in English Language and Education
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v12i3.41863
Primary Topic
Educational Practices and Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring reading self-efficacy among EFL learners from different academic disciplines

Patsawut Sukserm
Studies in English Language and Education
Educational Practices and Challenges
article

Exploring reading self-efficacy among EFL learners from different academic disciplines

Patsawut Sukserm
article en

Abstract

Reading self-efficacy plays a crucial role in the academic success of EFL learners, yet the extent to which it varies across academic disciplines remains underexplored. This study aims to (1) examine the level of reading self-efficacy among EFL learners from business, social sciences, and sciences; (2) investigate the relationship between different components of reading self-efficacy; and (3) compare self-efficacy levels across these academic disciplines. A total of 217 university-level EFL students in Thailand participated in the study. A 25-item reading self-efficacy questionnaire with strong reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.915) was employed. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, and ANOVA. The results reveal significant positive correlations between assessment of content (AOC) and summary of content (SOC) (r = 0.522, p 0.001), and between opinion on content (OOC) and SOC (r = 0.387, p 0.001). ANOVA results indicate significant differences in recognition of content elements (ROE) across disciplines, with business students scoring higher than science students (p = 0.015). Business students also demonstrated significantly higher self-efficacy in OOC compared to social science and science students (p = 0.001). These findings suggest that reading self-efficacy is influenced by students’ academic disciplines, supporting the view that self-efficacy is task-specific and context-dependent. Therefore, EFL instructors should implement tailored instructional approaches that address discipline-specific reading challenges to enhance students’ reading confidence and academic performance.

Studies in English Language and EducationVol. 12(3)
Chulalongkorn University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Educational Practices and Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.