Unveiling the accuracy of global GPP products in data-scarce mountain ecosystems of Southwest China

• GPP product performance varied significantly across ecosystems in Southwest China. • GOSIF showed the highest accuracy, followed by BESS, VPM, and MODIS. • BESS demonstrated superior sensitivity to drought conditions. • All products performed better during the non-growing season than the growing season. Accurate estimation of terrestrial gross primary production (GPP) in ecologically and topographically complex regions remains a major challenge. This study evaluated four global GPP products—BESS, GOSIF, MOD17, and VPM—against eddy covariance (EC) observations from 11 flux towers in Southwest China. The region spans diverse vegetation types and climatic gradients, making it an ideal testbed for satellite-based GPP assessment. Site-level evaluation showed that GOSIF had the strongest correlation with GPP-EC (R 2 > 0.61) but consistently overestimated GPP, especially during summer. BESS achieved the lowest RMSE (2.02 g C/m 2 /d) and better captured interannual variation, including drought impacts. MOD17 and VPM tended to underestimate summer peaks, particularly in evergreen broadleaf forests. Seasonal analysis revealed that all four products performed better in the non-growing season, with BESS showing the highest growing-season accuracy (R 2 = 0.39, RMSE = 2.44 g C/m 2 /d). GOSIF notably overestimated seasonal totals, especially in shrubland and grassland ecosystems. Spatially, mean annual GPP estimates varied by over 30 % among products, with GOSIF being the highest (1497.32 g C/m 2 ) and BESS being the lowest (1109.73 g C/m 2 ). The vegetation-type analysis revealed the highest level of agreement in deciduous broadleaf forests, while the greatest discrepancies were observed in open shrublands. Our findings highlight the strengths and limitations of current GPP products in a mountainous, heterogeneous region. Incorporating physiological indicators such as solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF), improving model parameterization of phenology, and accounting for local environmental stressors are essential for enhancing GPP estimation in Southwest China and similar landscapes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2025.104908
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unveiling the accuracy of global GPP products in data-scarce mountain ecosystems of Southwest China

Xiaojie Gao, Xiaobin Guan, Debin Kong, Yuanchao Wang et al.
International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
article

Unveiling the accuracy of global GPP products in data-scarce mountain ecosystems of Southwest China

Xiaojie Gao, Xiaobin Guan, Debin Kong, Yuanchao Wang, Qiaoyun Xie, Weiyu Shi, Xiaojun She, Chongjing Zhu, Jian Chen, Yao Li, Yu Wang
article en

Abstract

• GPP product performance varied significantly across ecosystems in Southwest China. • GOSIF showed the highest accuracy, followed by BESS, VPM, and MODIS. • BESS demonstrated superior sensitivity to drought conditions. • All products performed better during the non-growing season than the growing season. Accurate estimation of terrestrial gross primary production (GPP) in ecologically and topographically complex regions remains a major challenge. This study evaluated four global GPP products—BESS, GOSIF, MOD17, and VPM—against eddy covariance (EC) observations from 11 flux towers in Southwest China. The region spans diverse vegetation types and climatic gradients, making it an ideal testbed for satellite-based GPP assessment. Site-level evaluation showed that GOSIF had the strongest correlation with GPP-EC (R 2 > 0.61) but consistently overestimated GPP, especially during summer. BESS achieved the lowest RMSE (2.02 g C/m 2 /d) and better captured interannual variation, including drought impacts. MOD17 and VPM tended to underestimate summer peaks, particularly in evergreen broadleaf forests. Seasonal analysis revealed that all four products performed better in the non-growing season, with BESS showing the highest growing-season accuracy (R 2 = 0.39, RMSE = 2.44 g C/m 2 /d). GOSIF notably overestimated seasonal totals, especially in shrubland and grassland ecosystems. Spatially, mean annual GPP estimates varied by over 30 % among products, with GOSIF being the highest (1497.32 g C/m 2 ) and BESS being the lowest (1109.73 g C/m 2 ). The vegetation-type analysis revealed the highest level of agreement in deciduous broadleaf forests, while the greatest discrepancies were observed in open shrublands. Our findings highlight the strengths and limitations of current GPP products in a mountainous, heterogeneous region. Incorporating physiological indicators such as solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF), improving model parameterization of phenology, and accounting for local environmental stressors are essential for enhancing GPP estimation in Southwest China and similar landscapes.

International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and GeoinformationVol. 144
Southwest University (CN), The University of Western Australia (AU), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), CRC for Spatial information (AU), Wuhan University (CN), Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center (US), Aerospace Information Research Institute (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.