Metaphorical emergence through propositional and imagistic modes of metaphor processing

Building on Carston's (2010) distinction between propositional and imagistic modes of metaphor processing and Indurkya's (2007) dichotomy between similarity-based and similarity-creating metaphors, this paper discusses how propositional and imagistic modes are involved in the processing of similarity-based and similarity-creating metaphors. Based on these distinctions, four sets of conditions are discussed separately. Then, it is suggested that the representation constructed for the target domain of a metaphor can be a combination of propositional and imagistic elements, although one of them may be dominant. The propositional component is the product of propositional emergence, while the imagistic component is the product of imagistic emergence. The combination of these two components constitutes the target representation emerging through the metaphor. • A metaphorical representation can be a combination of propositional and imagistic elements • The propositional component of a metaphorical representation is the product of propositional emergence. • The imagistic component is the product of imagistic emergence.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Language & Communication
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2025.10.003
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Metaphorical emergence through propositional and imagistic modes of metaphor processing

Omid Khatin‐Zadeh
1 citations
Language & Communication
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
2.12
article

Metaphorical emergence through propositional and imagistic modes of metaphor processing

Omid Khatin‐Zadeh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Building on Carston's (2010) distinction between propositional and imagistic modes of metaphor processing and Indurkya's (2007) dichotomy between similarity-based and similarity-creating metaphors, this paper discusses how propositional and imagistic modes are involved in the processing of similarity-based and similarity-creating metaphors. Based on these distinctions, four sets of conditions are discussed separately. Then, it is suggested that the representation constructed for the target domain of a metaphor can be a combination of propositional and imagistic elements, although one of them may be dominant. The propositional component is the product of propositional emergence, while the imagistic component is the product of imagistic emergence. The combination of these two components constitutes the target representation emerging through the metaphor. • A metaphorical representation can be a combination of propositional and imagistic elements • The propositional component of a metaphorical representation is the product of propositional emergence. • The imagistic component is the product of imagistic emergence.

Language & CommunicationVol. 105
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
2.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.