Beyond Metabolic Control: Psychosocial Benefits of Automated Insulin Delivery Systems in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes, a Systematic Review

Introduction: Type 1 diabetes (T1D) affects approximately 1.2 million children and adolescents worldwide. Despite advances in therapy, insulin remains the primary treatment, requiring tight glycemic control to prevent long-term complications. Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems, combining continuous glucose monitoring and insulin pumps with algorithms, have opened a new paradigm in T1D management. This review aims to synthesize data on psychosocial outcomes and quality of life (QoL) from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing AID systems to standard diabetes care in children and adolescents. Methods: A systematic search following PRISMA guidelines was conducted across Medline, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane databases. RCTs evaluating QoL of children with T1D using AID systems were included. Data extracted included participant demographics, AID system types, main outcomes, QoL scales, and results. Studies had to involve children and/or adolescents with T1D using AID systems and/or their caregivers and assess QoL or psychosocial outcomes using validated scales. Results: The search identified 3373 studies, with 14 meeting inclusion criteria, encompassing 1251 participants, mostly children, adolescents and young adults. Studies used various AID systems, including Control-IQ, CamAPS FX, Diabeloop DBL4K, Medtronic MiniMed ® 670G and Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop, and compared them to standard care. They showed variable improvements in treatment satisfaction and expectations, sleep quality, and QoL, along with a reduction in fear of hypoglycemia when using AID systems. However, the effect on emotional burden and diabetes distress was inconsistent. Conclusions: RCTs indicate that AID systems enhance treatment satisfaction, sleep quality, and hypoglycemia confidence in children with T1D, contributing to better diabetes-specific QoL. Although their impact on emotional burden and diabetes distress outcomes is inconsistent, AID systems generally offer significant benefits over traditional insulin delivery methods, underscoring their importance in pediatric T1D management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes Technology and Obesity Medicine
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/29986702251386033
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Metabolic Control: Psychosocial Benefits of Automated Insulin Delivery Systems in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes, a Systematic Review

Valérie Schwitzgebel, Fanny Iafrate-Luterbacher, Laure F. Pittet, Philippe Klee
Diabetes Technology and Obesity Medicine
Diabetes Management and Research
article

Beyond Metabolic Control: Psychosocial Benefits of Automated Insulin Delivery Systems in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes, a Systematic Review

Valérie Schwitzgebel, Fanny Iafrate-Luterbacher, Laure F. Pittet, Philippe Klee
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Type 1 diabetes (T1D) affects approximately 1.2 million children and adolescents worldwide. Despite advances in therapy, insulin remains the primary treatment, requiring tight glycemic control to prevent long-term complications. Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems, combining continuous glucose monitoring and insulin pumps with algorithms, have opened a new paradigm in T1D management. This review aims to synthesize data on psychosocial outcomes and quality of life (QoL) from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing AID systems to standard diabetes care in children and adolescents. Methods: A systematic search following PRISMA guidelines was conducted across Medline, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane databases. RCTs evaluating QoL of children with T1D using AID systems were included. Data extracted included participant demographics, AID system types, main outcomes, QoL scales, and results. Studies had to involve children and/or adolescents with T1D using AID systems and/or their caregivers and assess QoL or psychosocial outcomes using validated scales. Results: The search identified 3373 studies, with 14 meeting inclusion criteria, encompassing 1251 participants, mostly children, adolescents and young adults. Studies used various AID systems, including Control-IQ, CamAPS FX, Diabeloop DBL4K, Medtronic MiniMed ® 670G and Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop, and compared them to standard care. They showed variable improvements in treatment satisfaction and expectations, sleep quality, and QoL, along with a reduction in fear of hypoglycemia when using AID systems. However, the effect on emotional burden and diabetes distress was inconsistent. Conclusions: RCTs indicate that AID systems enhance treatment satisfaction, sleep quality, and hypoglycemia confidence in children with T1D, contributing to better diabetes-specific QoL. Although their impact on emotional burden and diabetes distress outcomes is inconsistent, AID systems generally offer significant benefits over traditional insulin delivery methods, underscoring their importance in pediatric T1D management.

Diabetes Technology and Obesity MedicineVol. 1(1)
University of Geneva (CH), University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Diabetes Management and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.