Increase in liana prevalence after logging and thinning in an eastern Amazonian forest

Sustainability of forestry relies on the recovery of forest structure and timber stocks after logging. Canopy gaps created by logging often lead to liana proliferation, which can reduce forest productivity and reduce global CO 2 sequestration. Using inventory data from Brazil’s Tapajós National Forest, we examined changes in liana prevalence (proportion of trees with lianas) following selective logging and thinning. Prevalence increase was proportional to the reduction of tree basal area (BA), measured from 12 ha of logged and 9 ha of subsequently thinned inventory plots. Following a 24 % BA reduction, liana prevalence doubled within seven years after logging and thereafter remained elevated throughout the 20-year study period. Twelve years after logging, 3/4 of the plots were thinned of non-commercial species by girdling. Annual increase in liana prevalence was similar (c. 2 percentage points per year, %pts/yr) in the immediate years after both logging and thinning. However, after thinning, for each additional m 2 /ha of basal area reduction, the increment in annual increase of liana prevalence was four times larger than after logging (0.28 vs. 0.06 %pts/yr). Thinning occurred before forest structure had recovered to mid- and top-canopy closure, and leaving the liana vegetation intact led to a more intense increase in liana prevalence than had occurred after the initial logging. Our results suggest that thinning by girdling may not effectively liberate future crop trees, unless combined with ecologically sound suppression of excessive liana growth. Adequate forest recovery time appears necessary to prevent recurring liana increases after successive logging cycles and thinning. • The proportion of trees with lianas (prevalence) doubled after logging. • Liana prevalence increased in proportion to the reduction in basal area (BA). • Per unit of BA reduction, thinning increased liana prevalence more than logging. • Liana prevalence remained high in unlogged areas for the 20-year study period.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forest Ecology and Management
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2025.123280
Primary Topic
Plant Diversity and Evolution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Increase in liana prevalence after logging and thinning in an eastern Amazonian forest

Lucas Mazzei, Hanna Tuomisto, José Bruno do Nascimento Clementino, Johan Slätis et al.
Forest Ecology and Management
Plant Diversity and Evolution
article

Increase in liana prevalence after logging and thinning in an eastern Amazonian forest

Lucas Mazzei, Hanna Tuomisto, José Bruno do Nascimento Clementino, Johan Slätis, Kari Auranen
article en

Abstract

Sustainability of forestry relies on the recovery of forest structure and timber stocks after logging. Canopy gaps created by logging often lead to liana proliferation, which can reduce forest productivity and reduce global CO 2 sequestration. Using inventory data from Brazil’s Tapajós National Forest, we examined changes in liana prevalence (proportion of trees with lianas) following selective logging and thinning. Prevalence increase was proportional to the reduction of tree basal area (BA), measured from 12 ha of logged and 9 ha of subsequently thinned inventory plots. Following a 24 % BA reduction, liana prevalence doubled within seven years after logging and thereafter remained elevated throughout the 20-year study period. Twelve years after logging, 3/4 of the plots were thinned of non-commercial species by girdling. Annual increase in liana prevalence was similar (c. 2 percentage points per year, %pts/yr) in the immediate years after both logging and thinning. However, after thinning, for each additional m 2 /ha of basal area reduction, the increment in annual increase of liana prevalence was four times larger than after logging (0.28 vs. 0.06 %pts/yr). Thinning occurred before forest structure had recovered to mid- and top-canopy closure, and leaving the liana vegetation intact led to a more intense increase in liana prevalence than had occurred after the initial logging. Our results suggest that thinning by girdling may not effectively liberate future crop trees, unless combined with ecologically sound suppression of excessive liana growth. Adequate forest recovery time appears necessary to prevent recurring liana increases after successive logging cycles and thinning. • The proportion of trees with lianas (prevalence) doubled after logging. • Liana prevalence increased in proportion to the reduction in basal area (BA). • Per unit of BA reduction, thinning increased liana prevalence more than logging. • Liana prevalence remained high in unlogged areas for the 20-year study period.

Forest Ecology and ManagementVol. 599
Universidade de Brasília (BR), University of Turku (FI), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Aarhus University (DK), Amazon Research Foundation (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Plant Diversity and Evolution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.