Applicability, scope, and threshold determination of the cotton water stress characterization index: Prediction based on machine learning algorithms and validated by field experiments

Accurate prediction of crop water diagnostic indicators is crucial for improving crop water productivity; however, the applicability of water stress indices for diagnosing crop water status requires study. We analyzed the accuracy of machine learning (ML) algorithms in predicting the Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI) and transpiration-based Plant Water Deficit Index (PWDI). Their applicability across the growth cycle and threshold values was determined. Using field experiment data (n = 2 years) from cotton under mulch drip irrigation in Xinjiang, we evaluated the predictive performance of four ML algorithms for the cotton CWSI and PWDI. Using XGBoost's variable importance analysis and the random forest (RF) two-dimensional partial dependence analysis, we determined responses of indices to key factors and their applicability. Tree-based models, specifically RF and XGBoost, performed better than other models. The best CWSI predictors were midday air temperature (T a -13:00), leaf temperature (T c ), and vapor pressure deficit (VPD). Key variables PWDI factors included stem sap flow rate (V), transpiration rate (T r ), and solar radiation (SR). CWSI was most accurately predicted when T a -13:00 < 27°C and T c < 27°C, whereas for PWDI, optimal T a -13:00 > 27°C, root-zone soil water content (SWC-RZ) < 0.175 cm³ cm⁻³ , and SR < 400 W m⁻². Threshold analyses suggested CWSI values for the squaring and boll stages of 0.79 and 0.80, respectively, but 0.65 for PWDI across stages. Using the indices, critical insights were determined for developing and implementing irrigation strategies to optimize crop water-use efficiency and precise water management in agricultural systems. • Tree-based models outperformed others in predicting CWSI and PWDI. • Air temperature and stem sap flow are key predictors of CWSI and PWDI. • Applicable ranges for CWSI and PWDI were identified. • CWSI and PWDI thresholds for cotton squaring and boll stages were determined.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Water Management
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109921
Primary Topic
Textile materials and evaluations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applicability, scope, and threshold determination of the cotton water stress characterization index: Prediction based on machine learning algorithms and validated by field experiments

Chuanjuan Wang, Xiaopeng Ma, Wenting Qi, Jiandong Wang et al.
Agricultural Water Management
Textile materials and evaluations
article

Applicability, scope, and threshold determination of the cotton water stress characterization index: Prediction based on machine learning algorithms and validated by field experiments

Chuanjuan Wang, Xiaopeng Ma, Wenting Qi, Jiandong Wang, Hang Wang
article en

Abstract

Accurate prediction of crop water diagnostic indicators is crucial for improving crop water productivity; however, the applicability of water stress indices for diagnosing crop water status requires study. We analyzed the accuracy of machine learning (ML) algorithms in predicting the Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI) and transpiration-based Plant Water Deficit Index (PWDI). Their applicability across the growth cycle and threshold values was determined. Using field experiment data (n = 2 years) from cotton under mulch drip irrigation in Xinjiang, we evaluated the predictive performance of four ML algorithms for the cotton CWSI and PWDI. Using XGBoost's variable importance analysis and the random forest (RF) two-dimensional partial dependence analysis, we determined responses of indices to key factors and their applicability. Tree-based models, specifically RF and XGBoost, performed better than other models. The best CWSI predictors were midday air temperature (T a -13:00), leaf temperature (T c ), and vapor pressure deficit (VPD). Key variables PWDI factors included stem sap flow rate (V), transpiration rate (T r ), and solar radiation (SR). CWSI was most accurately predicted when T a -13:00 < 27°C and T c < 27°C, whereas for PWDI, optimal T a -13:00 > 27°C, root-zone soil water content (SWC-RZ) < 0.175 cm³ cm⁻³ , and SR < 400 W m⁻². Threshold analyses suggested CWSI values for the squaring and boll stages of 0.79 and 0.80, respectively, but 0.65 for PWDI across stages. Using the indices, critical insights were determined for developing and implementing irrigation strategies to optimize crop water-use efficiency and precise water management in agricultural systems. • Tree-based models outperformed others in predicting CWSI and PWDI. • Air temperature and stem sap flow are key predictors of CWSI and PWDI. • Applicable ranges for CWSI and PWDI were identified. • CWSI and PWDI thresholds for cotton squaring and boll stages were determined.

Agricultural Water ManagementVol. 321
Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN), Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture (CN), Taiyuan University of Science and Technology (CN), Taiyuan University of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Textile materials and evaluations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.