The psychosocial risk factors scale: factorial validity and reliability analysis

<i>Objectives.</i> Assessing psychosocial risks in the workplace is essential for promoting employee well-being and occupational safety. This study validates the psychosocial risk factors scale (INSAT_ERPS), a comprehensive instrument developed to identify and measure diverse psychosocial risks in occupational settings. <i>Methods</i>. A cross-sectional study was conducted between February 2023 and May 2024 with 1739 Portuguese workers from various sectors. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Missing data were imputed using the expectation-maximization algorithm. EFA employed maximum likelihood extraction with oblimin rotation and Kaiser normalization, supported by a Bartlett Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value of 0.961 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <i>Results</i>. CFA confirmed the seven-factor structure identified in EFA, encompassing 44 items across key dimensions: 'Work Intensity', 'Working Hours', 'Autonomy and Initiative', 'Social Work Relations', 'Employment Relations', 'Emotional Demands', and 'Work Values'. The model demonstrated strong psychometric properties, with Cronbach's <i>α</i> ranging from 0.851 to 0.917. Factor loadings (0.422-0.911) indicated statistically significant and meaningful contributions to their respective dimensions. <i>Conclusions</i>. Despite minor cross-loadings, the factorial structure was robust, confirming the INSAT_ERPS as a valid and reliable tool for diagnosing and managing psychosocial risks in occupational health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2025.2566584
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The psychosocial risk factors scale: factorial validity and reliability analysis

Carla Barros, Pilar Baylina, Liliana Cunha, Álvaro Rocha
2 citations
International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics
Workplace Health and Well-being
5.63
article

The psychosocial risk factors scale: factorial validity and reliability analysis

Carla Barros, Pilar Baylina, Liliana Cunha, Álvaro Rocha
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<i>Objectives.</i> Assessing psychosocial risks in the workplace is essential for promoting employee well-being and occupational safety. This study validates the psychosocial risk factors scale (INSAT_ERPS), a comprehensive instrument developed to identify and measure diverse psychosocial risks in occupational settings. <i>Methods</i>. A cross-sectional study was conducted between February 2023 and May 2024 with 1739 Portuguese workers from various sectors. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Missing data were imputed using the expectation-maximization algorithm. EFA employed maximum likelihood extraction with oblimin rotation and Kaiser normalization, supported by a Bartlett Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value of 0.961 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <i>Results</i>. CFA confirmed the seven-factor structure identified in EFA, encompassing 44 items across key dimensions: 'Work Intensity', 'Working Hours', 'Autonomy and Initiative', 'Social Work Relations', 'Employment Relations', 'Emotional Demands', and 'Work Values'. The model demonstrated strong psychometric properties, with Cronbach's <i>α</i> ranging from 0.851 to 0.917. Factor loadings (0.422-0.911) indicated statistically significant and meaningful contributions to their respective dimensions. <i>Conclusions</i>. Despite minor cross-loadings, the factorial structure was robust, confirming the INSAT_ERPS as a valid and reliable tool for diagnosing and managing psychosocial risks in occupational health.

International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics
University of Lisbon (PT), Fernando Pessoa University (PT), Universidade do Porto (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Workplace Health and Well-being
5.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.