Geoid determination using airborne gravity vectors

Abstract In traditional airborne gravimetry, the vertical component of the gravity vector is used as an approximation of the measured magnitude of the gravity vector, which enters the determination of the local geoid. In this study, a comprehensive computational scheme for determining the local geoid using three components of the airborne gravity vector is presented. Our approach extends the existing one-step method for local geoid modeling by incorporating the full gravity vector measured by airborne sensors as boundary values in the gravimetric boundary-value problem. We derive integral kernel functions along with far-zone contributions for the three components of the airborne gravity vector and apply deterministic modifications to them. To validate our derivations, we use a global geopotential model (GGM)-based airborne gravity vectors burdened with realistic colored noise at one of the most challenging test sites for geoid determination, the 1-cm geoid test area in Colorado (USA). Results of closed-loop tests confirm that applying all three components of the GGM-based airborne gravity vector improves the internal accuracy of the geoid by 50% compared to using only the vertical component. We further use real airborne gravity vectors observed at a test site in the same region and show that the STD of the estimated geoid heights evaluated against the reference geoidal heights along the Geoid Slope Validation Survey of 2017 (GSVS17) Line is 2.3 cm using the “traditional approach” and 1.3 cm including the horizontal components. This indicates a significant improvement in the external accuracy (~ 46%) of the geoid when the full gravity vector is used, without using other heterogeneous observations. Graphical Abstract

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth Planets and Space
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-025-02277-8
Primary Topic
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geoid determination using airborne gravity vectors

Spiros Pagiatakis, Mehdi Goli, Stephen J. Ferguson, Ismael Foroughi et al.
Earth Planets and Space
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
article

Geoid determination using airborne gravity vectors

Spiros Pagiatakis, Mehdi Goli, Stephen J. Ferguson, Ismael Foroughi, Pavel Novák
article en

Abstract

Abstract In traditional airborne gravimetry, the vertical component of the gravity vector is used as an approximation of the measured magnitude of the gravity vector, which enters the determination of the local geoid. In this study, a comprehensive computational scheme for determining the local geoid using three components of the airborne gravity vector is presented. Our approach extends the existing one-step method for local geoid modeling by incorporating the full gravity vector measured by airborne sensors as boundary values in the gravimetric boundary-value problem. We derive integral kernel functions along with far-zone contributions for the three components of the airborne gravity vector and apply deterministic modifications to them. To validate our derivations, we use a global geopotential model (GGM)-based airborne gravity vectors burdened with realistic colored noise at one of the most challenging test sites for geoid determination, the 1-cm geoid test area in Colorado (USA). Results of closed-loop tests confirm that applying all three components of the GGM-based airborne gravity vector improves the internal accuracy of the geoid by 50% compared to using only the vertical component. We further use real airborne gravity vectors observed at a test site in the same region and show that the STD of the estimated geoid heights evaluated against the reference geoidal heights along the Geoid Slope Validation Survey of 2017 (GSVS17) Line is 2.3 cm using the “traditional approach” and 1.3 cm including the horizontal components. This indicates a significant improvement in the external accuracy (~ 46%) of the geoid when the full gravity vector is used, without using other heterogeneous observations. Graphical Abstract

Earth Planets and SpaceVol. 77(1)
Geological Survey of Canada (CA), University of Shahrood (IR), York University (CA), University of West Bohemia in Pilsen (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.