Clinical diagnostic criteria for cardiogenic shock should be based on pathophysiology

Cardiogenic shock is a clinical syndrome characterized by cardiac pump failure, resulting in low cardiac output and subsequent tissue hypoperfusion. Current guidelines recommend diagnosing cardiogenic shock based on the presence of hypotension and signs of hypoperfusion. However, recent randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that these criteria are imperfect and may not reliably distinguish cardiogenic shock from other forms of shock, such as hypovolemic, distributive, or mixed types. Therefore, new clinical diagnostic criteria are urgently needed. A revised definition, grounded in the underlying pathophysiology, should diagnose cardiogenic shock based on low cardiac output, objective evidence of tissue hypoperfusion from reliable biomarkers, and the exclusion of hypovolemia. Enhancing the accuracy of cardiogenic shock diagnosis could significantly improve patient selection for therapies specifically targeted at this condition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1139/cjpp-2025-0224
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical diagnostic criteria for cardiogenic shock should be based on pathophysiology

Petr Ostadal
Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Clinical diagnostic criteria for cardiogenic shock should be based on pathophysiology

Petr Ostadal
article en

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock is a clinical syndrome characterized by cardiac pump failure, resulting in low cardiac output and subsequent tissue hypoperfusion. Current guidelines recommend diagnosing cardiogenic shock based on the presence of hypotension and signs of hypoperfusion. However, recent randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that these criteria are imperfect and may not reliably distinguish cardiogenic shock from other forms of shock, such as hypovolemic, distributive, or mixed types. Therefore, new clinical diagnostic criteria are urgently needed. A revised definition, grounded in the underlying pathophysiology, should diagnose cardiogenic shock based on low cardiac output, objective evidence of tissue hypoperfusion from reliable biomarkers, and the exclusion of hypovolemia. Enhancing the accuracy of cardiogenic shock diagnosis could significantly improve patient selection for therapies specifically targeted at this condition.

Canadian Journal of Physiology and PharmacologyVol. 104
Charles University (CZ), University Hospital in Motol (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Clinical diagnostic criteria for cardiogenic shock should be based on pathophysiology — Petr Ostadal · Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS