From socialism to “Chinese characteristics”

This article explores analytic tools for the anthropology of China. It begins by reviewing what I call “the post-socialist framework” that anthropologists in the Anglophone world tend to deploy. I acknowledge the significance of this framework while also identifying discrepancies between its analytical affordances and ethnographic realities in contemporary China. Seeking alternative interpretations, I turn to the emerging “Chinese civilization” approach in mainland China, focusing specifically on tianxia thought. The second half of the article traces the genealogy of the entanglement between socialism and tianxia across the administrations of Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping, and Xi Jinping. I argue that anthropologies of post-reform China stand to benefit from engaging Chinese history and intellectual tradition. By juxtaposing these discourses, the article demonstrates why and how we should read China as both a post-socialist and a civilizational state.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hau Journal of Ethnographic Theory
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/737985
Primary Topic
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From socialism to “Chinese characteristics”

Yanping Ni
Hau Journal of Ethnographic Theory
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
article

From socialism to “Chinese characteristics”

Yanping Ni
article en

Abstract

This article explores analytic tools for the anthropology of China. It begins by reviewing what I call “the post-socialist framework” that anthropologists in the Anglophone world tend to deploy. I acknowledge the significance of this framework while also identifying discrepancies between its analytical affordances and ethnographic realities in contemporary China. Seeking alternative interpretations, I turn to the emerging “Chinese civilization” approach in mainland China, focusing specifically on tianxia thought. The second half of the article traces the genealogy of the entanglement between socialism and tianxia across the administrations of Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping, and Xi Jinping. I argue that anthropologies of post-reform China stand to benefit from engaging Chinese history and intellectual tradition. By juxtaposing these discourses, the article demonstrates why and how we should read China as both a post-socialist and a civilizational state.

Hau Journal of Ethnographic TheoryVol. 15(3)
Princeton University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.