Appraisal quality and loan characteristics: evidence from Newcomb–Benford Law

Abstract Leading digits in mortgage collateral value estimates are expected to approximate a logarithmic distribution, consistent with the Newcomb–Benford Law (NBL), when such values are modeled as geometric sequences or random samples drawn from heterogeneous price distributions. Using representative US datasets, we document substantial discrepancies between the observed and expected distributions of leading digits in appraisal values. The magnitude of this deviation increases with loan-to-value ratios and interest rates, while it declines with higher credit scores and safer credit classifications. We also find a systematic underrepresentation of high digits (e.g., 8 and 9) and overrepresentation of low digits (e.g., 0 and 1) in the second leading positions, and that this pattern becomes more pronounced with greater ex-ante loan risk. These findings suggest that nonconformance with NBL may stem from upward bias in appraised values, particularly in riskier lending environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Empirical Economics
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-025-02814-0
Primary Topic
Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Appraisal quality and loan characteristics: evidence from Newcomb–Benford Law

Joseph R. Mason, Hong Lee
Empirical Economics
Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection
article

Appraisal quality and loan characteristics: evidence from Newcomb–Benford Law

Joseph R. Mason, Hong Lee
article en

Abstract

Abstract Leading digits in mortgage collateral value estimates are expected to approximate a logarithmic distribution, consistent with the Newcomb–Benford Law (NBL), when such values are modeled as geometric sequences or random samples drawn from heterogeneous price distributions. Using representative US datasets, we document substantial discrepancies between the observed and expected distributions of leading digits in appraisal values. The magnitude of this deviation increases with loan-to-value ratios and interest rates, while it declines with higher credit scores and safer credit classifications. We also find a systematic underrepresentation of high digits (e.g., 8 and 9) and overrepresentation of low digits (e.g., 0 and 1) in the second leading positions, and that this pattern becomes more pronounced with greater ex-ante loan risk. These findings suggest that nonconformance with NBL may stem from upward bias in appraised values, particularly in riskier lending environments.

Empirical EconomicsVol. 69(6)
Louisiana State University (US), Wright State University (US)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.