Using Community Feedback to Identify Conservation Actions for a Zoo

Background Modern zoos seek to support their audiences in taking conservation action. To increase participation and maximize environmental impact, zoos should consider their community members’ perspectives from the outset -- i.e., in the selection of the action -- including understanding perceived barriers, benefits, current participation, and ease of taking the action. Focus of the Article This article focuses on a zoo’s process to integrate community perspectives when selecting conservation actions for messaging. We collected data from four audiences and applied community-based social marketing (CBSM) and other decision-making models to identify conservation actions in which efforts by the zoo could increase community engagement and behavior change. Research Question How can a zoo incorporate community perspectives into the process of selecting conservation actions for messaging?. Importance to Social Marketing Field Using the CBSM decision-making equation and a novel decision-making equation inspired by research with zoo visitors (the NERO model), the Queens Zoo balanced environmental impacts, community perspectives, and its’ expertise in developing and implementing conservation campaigns. Other institutions, like schools, museums, and universities looking to engage their communities in actions should apply this strategy to maximize the impact of their campaigns, especially when an action does not need to be done at home. Methods We used a two-phase mixed-methods design to answer our research question. Phase 1 included a content analysis, a survey of 42 zoo educators, interviews with 28 Queens Zoo visitors, and focus groups with 24 community members to identify eight conservation actions that were local priorities. We explored these actions more deeply in Phase 2, fielding an online survey to 400 residents of the New York City metro area. We used survey and environmental impact data to assign numeric values to the variables in two decision-making equations: CBSM and the NERO model, which is based on research with zoo visitors. Using the scores, we ranked the eight actions relative to each other and used these results to inform discussions with zoo leadership to strategically identify actions where the zoo’s expertise can support broad and sustainable behavior change. Results Conservation actions prioritized during Phase 1 primarily included protecting the environment in general and protecting wildlife and habitats. Phase 2 survey data and application of the decision-making equations highlighted four actions nested within those themes -- enrolling with a clean energy provider, advocating for green space, reducing plastic use, and creating wildlife habitat -- as having high potential to engage many people and have meaningful environmental impact. Discussions with zoo leadership focused on how these actions align with zoo priorities and expertise and how the zoo could support communities in conservation action. Recommendations for Research or Practice Conservation organizations seeking to support people in the behavior change process should consider how decision-making equations and data from their communities can help them select actions for campaigns. Incorporating community perspectives throughout the design of a conservation action campaign will increase relevance and interest and maximize participation and environmental impact.