Assessing the relationship between gut microbiota and hyperprolactinemia: A bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study

The relationship between hyperprolactinemia and gut microbiota remains unclear at present. This study employs a Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to assess the potential causal links between gut microbiota and the incidence of hyperprolactinemia. Genetic instrumental variables associated with gut microbiota were identified through a genome-wide association study involving 18,340 participants. Summary statistics regarding hyperprolactinemia were obtained from FinnGen R10, comprising 1099 cases and 395,289 controls. The primary analysis utilized the inverse-variance weighted method. Additionally, we employed the weighted-median method, MR-Egger regression, and MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier test to validate the robustness of our findings. Subsequently, a reverse MR analysis was conducted to assess the potential for reverse causation. We identified suggestive associations between 7 bacterial traits and the risk of hyperprolactinemia (odds ratio [OR]: 0.685; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.483 to 0.97; P = .033 for Family Bacteroidales S24.7; OR: 1.589; 95% CI: 1.057 to 2.389; P = .026 for Genus Ruminococcus gauvreauii group; OR: 0.686; 95% CI: 0.522 to 0.901; P = .007 for Genus Anaerofilumgroup; OR: 1.333; 95% CI: 1.017 to 1.747; P = .037 for Genus Eisenbergiella group; OR: 0.595; 95% CI: 0.416 to 0.852; P = .005 for Genus Erysipelotrichaceae UCG003 group; OR: 1.3986; 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.954; P = .005 for Genus Ruminococcaceae UCG014 group and OR: 0.781; 95% CI: 0.612 to 0.998; P = .048 for Genus Peptococcus group).We did not find statistically significant associations between hyperprolactinemia and these 7 bacterial traits in the reverse MR analysis. Our systematic analysis provides evidence supporting a potential causal relationship between specific gut microbiota taxa and the risk of hyperprolactinemia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000045484
Primary Topic
Gut microbiota and health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the relationship between gut microbiota and hyperprolactinemia: A bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study

Lanhui Zhang, Fuqing Ji, Sujin Wang, Chuanlin Zhao et al.
Medicine
Gut microbiota and health
article

Assessing the relationship between gut microbiota and hyperprolactinemia: A bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study

Lanhui Zhang, Fuqing Ji, Sujin Wang, Chuanlin Zhao, Mingkun Zhang, Xulong Zhu, Wei Miao, Teng Qi, Xiaorui Zhou, Yujie Hu, Zhenping Ouyang
article en

Abstract

The relationship between hyperprolactinemia and gut microbiota remains unclear at present. This study employs a Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to assess the potential causal links between gut microbiota and the incidence of hyperprolactinemia. Genetic instrumental variables associated with gut microbiota were identified through a genome-wide association study involving 18,340 participants. Summary statistics regarding hyperprolactinemia were obtained from FinnGen R10, comprising 1099 cases and 395,289 controls. The primary analysis utilized the inverse-variance weighted method. Additionally, we employed the weighted-median method, MR-Egger regression, and MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier test to validate the robustness of our findings. Subsequently, a reverse MR analysis was conducted to assess the potential for reverse causation. We identified suggestive associations between 7 bacterial traits and the risk of hyperprolactinemia (odds ratio [OR]: 0.685; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.483 to 0.97; P = .033 for Family Bacteroidales S24.7; OR: 1.589; 95% CI: 1.057 to 2.389; P = .026 for Genus Ruminococcus gauvreauii group; OR: 0.686; 95% CI: 0.522 to 0.901; P = .007 for Genus Anaerofilumgroup; OR: 1.333; 95% CI: 1.017 to 1.747; P = .037 for Genus Eisenbergiella group; OR: 0.595; 95% CI: 0.416 to 0.852; P = .005 for Genus Erysipelotrichaceae UCG003 group; OR: 1.3986; 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.954; P = .005 for Genus Ruminococcaceae UCG014 group and OR: 0.781; 95% CI: 0.612 to 0.998; P = .048 for Genus Peptococcus group).We did not find statistically significant associations between hyperprolactinemia and these 7 bacterial traits in the reverse MR analysis. Our systematic analysis provides evidence supporting a potential causal relationship between specific gut microbiota taxa and the risk of hyperprolactinemia.

MedicineVol. 104(43)
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (CN), Tianjin University (CN), Shanxi Medical University (CN), Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital (CN), Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen (CN), Shaanxi Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), Xijing Hospital (CN), Shanxi Provincial People’s Hospital (CN), Air Force Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Gut microbiota and health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.