A Mixed-Methods Evaluation Design for a Secondary School Equity Program: Utilizing Culturally Responsive and Values-Engaged Approaches

This article details the design of a mixed-methods evaluation for a new equity program serving underrepresented and racially minoritized students at a selective-admissions, gifted public secondary school in the U.S. Rooted in culturally responsive and values-engaged approaches, we explain how principles and practices drawn from these approaches informed our decision-making on the evaluation's mixed-methods design and implementation over two years (two cycles of evaluation). These approaches emphasize ensuring inclusivity in participation; calling attention to culture, power, and equity in all evaluation aspects; and fostering dialogue on conceptualizing and operationalizing values like equity. It is not simple to implement these principles and practices in school-based evaluation. In this article, we share a constellation of issues we navigated throughout the evaluation process and our lessons learned.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Evaluation
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10982140251380109
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Mixed-Methods Evaluation Design for a Secondary School Equity Program: Utilizing Culturally Responsive and Values-Engaged Approaches

Mary M. Galloway, Valerie O’Brien, Melissa Rae Goodnight, Jasmine Johnson et al.
American Journal of Evaluation
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
article

A Mixed-Methods Evaluation Design for a Secondary School Equity Program: Utilizing Culturally Responsive and Values-Engaged Approaches

Mary M. Galloway, Valerie O’Brien, Melissa Rae Goodnight, Jasmine Johnson, Mostafa Hanafy, Anthony B. Sullers
article en

Abstract

This article details the design of a mixed-methods evaluation for a new equity program serving underrepresented and racially minoritized students at a selective-admissions, gifted public secondary school in the U.S. Rooted in culturally responsive and values-engaged approaches, we explain how principles and practices drawn from these approaches informed our decision-making on the evaluation's mixed-methods design and implementation over two years (two cycles of evaluation). These approaches emphasize ensuring inclusivity in participation; calling attention to culture, power, and equity in all evaluation aspects; and fostering dialogue on conceptualizing and operationalizing values like equity. It is not simple to implement these principles and practices in school-based evaluation. In this article, we share a constellation of issues we navigated throughout the evaluation process and our lessons learned.

American Journal of EvaluationVol. 47(1)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Mixed-Methods Evaluation Design for a Secondary School Equity Program: Utilizing Culturally Responsive and Values-Engaged Approaches — Mary M. Galloway, Valerie O’Brien, et al. · American Journal of Evaluation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS