Analyzing the Energetics of the Four Aromatic Ring Interactions: Theoretical Study

Despite the growing significance of noncovalent interactions in modern chemical studies, a comprehensive conception of fundamental noncovalent interactions remains elusive. The field still lacks a thorough understanding of these prototype interactions. Specifically, the nature of π-π and C-H···π interactions is not fully understood. These interactions are prevalent in biological systems, supramolecular chemistry, physics, and material science. Many aspects remain unclear, including their intensity, geometric dependencies, energetics, interactions, effects of substituents, and underlying physical principles. The dimers of four Fused Aromatic Rings (4FARs), Benz[<i>a</i>]anthracene (BA), Chrysene (Chy), Tetracene (Tet), and Triphenylene (Tri), have been investigated using Interaction Energy (IE), Stabilization Energy (E<sub><i>SAPT</i></sub>), frontier orbital gaps, and aromaticity indices (FLU, PDI, HOMA, and PLR). Additionally, real-space analyses (QTAIM and NCI) and crystal-topology descriptors (Hirshfeld surfaces and 2D fingerprints) are employed. These methods facilitate the study of stability, energy, and strength of noncovalent interactions as well as the preferred structure of dimer arrangements. Theoretical computations of these homodimer complexes indicate a weak correlation between the interaction and stabilization energies, as well as results from the HOMO-LUMO energy gap and Clar π sextet rule. However, aromaticity, QTAIM, NCI, and Hirshfeld analyses were employed to investigate intermolecular interactions, yielding an agreement with the interaction and stabilization energies. These theoretical methods agree on conformers; therefore, cross-conformers are more stable than face conformers. In terms of 4FAR homodimer configurations, the Tet conformer with a linear geometry is the most stable. However, the Tri conformer with a compact geometry is the lowest stable. The 4FAR homodimer complexes are stabilized by the dominant π-π stacking, which is the critical point.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.5c05216
Primary Topic
Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing the Energetics of the Four Aromatic Ring Interactions: Theoretical Study

Ali Hamzah Alessa
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds
article

Analyzing the Energetics of the Four Aromatic Ring Interactions: Theoretical Study

Ali Hamzah Alessa
article en

Abstract

Despite the growing significance of noncovalent interactions in modern chemical studies, a comprehensive conception of fundamental noncovalent interactions remains elusive. The field still lacks a thorough understanding of these prototype interactions. Specifically, the nature of π-π and C-H···π interactions is not fully understood. These interactions are prevalent in biological systems, supramolecular chemistry, physics, and material science. Many aspects remain unclear, including their intensity, geometric dependencies, energetics, interactions, effects of substituents, and underlying physical principles. The dimers of four Fused Aromatic Rings (4FARs), Benz[<i>a</i>]anthracene (BA), Chrysene (Chy), Tetracene (Tet), and Triphenylene (Tri), have been investigated using Interaction Energy (IE), Stabilization Energy (E<sub><i>SAPT</i></sub>), frontier orbital gaps, and aromaticity indices (FLU, PDI, HOMA, and PLR). Additionally, real-space analyses (QTAIM and NCI) and crystal-topology descriptors (Hirshfeld surfaces and 2D fingerprints) are employed. These methods facilitate the study of stability, energy, and strength of noncovalent interactions as well as the preferred structure of dimer arrangements. Theoretical computations of these homodimer complexes indicate a weak correlation between the interaction and stabilization energies, as well as results from the HOMO-LUMO energy gap and Clar π sextet rule. However, aromaticity, QTAIM, NCI, and Hirshfeld analyses were employed to investigate intermolecular interactions, yielding an agreement with the interaction and stabilization energies. These theoretical methods agree on conformers; therefore, cross-conformers are more stable than face conformers. In terms of 4FAR homodimer configurations, the Tet conformer with a linear geometry is the most stable. However, the Tri conformer with a compact geometry is the lowest stable. The 4FAR homodimer complexes are stabilized by the dominant π-π stacking, which is the critical point.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry AVol. 129(44)
University of Tabuk (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.