Contextual cues and stance decision-making in tennis forehand professional tennis players

In tennis, both open and square stances are used to produce forehands, although few differences have been found between them in terms of biomechanical or ball speed advantages. Hence, it is currently unclear why expert players decide to change their stance during rallies. The objective of this study was to analyze the influence of the context before the stroke on the players’ stance choice. Based on video analysis of men and women professional tennis matches, 2479 stances chosen by twenty players were recorded, considering contextual factors such as “balance of power” and direction of the ball to be played. Results revealed that open stance was used significantly more than square stance in 83.6% of the forehands, with no difference between women and men. These rates varied based on the balance of power, with fewer open stance during favorable situations (65.4%). The direction of the ball played influenced the choice of stance in favorable situations, with fewer open stance being used to play cross court. Taken all together, these results showed an interaction between factors preceding the forehand stroke when adopting a stance in tennis. When players had little time to make a choice, they overwhelmingly used open stances. This choice can be automated, which reduces the attentional load. On the other hand, when they had more time, they varied their type of stance according to the zone being played, with inter-individual differences. The findings could provide valuable insights for coaches to optimize training and improve players’ decision-making efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541251388815
Primary Topic
Sport Psychology and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contextual cues and stance decision-making in tennis forehand professional tennis players

Caroline Teulier, Nicolas Vignais, Lucile Delabarre, Céline Triolet
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Sport Psychology and Performance
article

Contextual cues and stance decision-making in tennis forehand professional tennis players

Caroline Teulier, Nicolas Vignais, Lucile Delabarre, Céline Triolet
article en

Abstract

In tennis, both open and square stances are used to produce forehands, although few differences have been found between them in terms of biomechanical or ball speed advantages. Hence, it is currently unclear why expert players decide to change their stance during rallies. The objective of this study was to analyze the influence of the context before the stroke on the players’ stance choice. Based on video analysis of men and women professional tennis matches, 2479 stances chosen by twenty players were recorded, considering contextual factors such as “balance of power” and direction of the ball to be played. Results revealed that open stance was used significantly more than square stance in 83.6% of the forehands, with no difference between women and men. These rates varied based on the balance of power, with fewer open stance during favorable situations (65.4%). The direction of the ball played influenced the choice of stance in favorable situations, with fewer open stance being used to play cross court. Taken all together, these results showed an interaction between factors preceding the forehand stroke when adopting a stance in tennis. When players had little time to make a choice, they overwhelmingly used open stances. This choice can be automated, which reduces the attentional load. On the other hand, when they had more time, they varied their type of stance according to the zone being played, with inter-individual differences. The findings could provide valuable insights for coaches to optimize training and improve players’ decision-making efficiency.

International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Université d'Orléans (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Université Rennes 2 (FR), Complexité, Innovation et Activités Motrices et Sportives (FR), Université de Rennes (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Sport Psychology and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.