Evaluating human-in-the-loop strategies for artificial intelligence-enabled translation of patient discharge instructions: a multidisciplinary analysis

Machine translation supported by artificial intelligence (AI) may enhance linguistically-concordant care for patients speaking languages other than English. This assessment of free-text inpatient discharge instructions in Arabic, Armenian, Bengali, simplified Chinese, Somali, and Spanish compared linguist, clinician, and family caregiver evaluations of translations generated by (1) ChatGPT-4o, (2) professional linguists, and (3) human-in-the-loop (AI-generated, professional linguist post-edited). Likert scales (1-5; higher is better) evaluated linguistic and clinical characteristics of each translation. ChatGPT-4o exhibited variable performance relative to professional translations, with poorest ratings for digitally underrepresented languages (Armenian and Somali). Conversely, human-in-the-loop translations achieved comparable, often better, outcomes to professional translations for all languages, (e.g., Armenian mean overall quality: 3.9 [95% CI 3.7-4.2] vs. professional 3.6 [3.4-3.9], p = 0.01), were most frequently preferred (46.5% vs. 28.4%) and had shorter mean translation time (7.1 [5.4-8.8] vs. 16.8 [13.7-19.9] min, p < 0.001). Human-in-the-loop strategies may enable safe, efficient, equitable machine translation application in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-02055-6
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating human-in-the-loop strategies for artificial intelligence-enabled translation of patient discharge instructions: a multidisciplinary analysis

Ryan Brewster, Changjun Su, Mondira Ray, Maymona E Nageye et al.
3 citations
npj Digital Medicine
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
8.45
article

Evaluating human-in-the-loop strategies for artificial intelligence-enabled translation of patient discharge instructions: a multidisciplinary analysis

Ryan Brewster, Changjun Su, Mondira Ray, Maymona E Nageye, Mohammad M. Sallam, Amitra Hoq, Alisa Khan, Raffi Tachdjian, Md Abdullah Al Mamoon, Mourad Hana, Martin E. Newell, Osama Ibrahim, Qing Li, Gary Man-Kit Tse, Nate Shaar, M. Hoq Chowdhury, Jonathan D. Hron, Crystal Chang, Angela L. Fan, Priscilla Gonzalez, Hoda Hassan, Gerardo I. Pérez Soto, Marwa Elborki, Adiba Geeti, Lucine Keseyan, Arthur Ohannessian, Ilan Rozen Eisenberg, Hannah Lev, Nicholas Kuzma
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Machine translation supported by artificial intelligence (AI) may enhance linguistically-concordant care for patients speaking languages other than English. This assessment of free-text inpatient discharge instructions in Arabic, Armenian, Bengali, simplified Chinese, Somali, and Spanish compared linguist, clinician, and family caregiver evaluations of translations generated by (1) ChatGPT-4o, (2) professional linguists, and (3) human-in-the-loop (AI-generated, professional linguist post-edited). Likert scales (1-5; higher is better) evaluated linguistic and clinical characteristics of each translation. ChatGPT-4o exhibited variable performance relative to professional translations, with poorest ratings for digitally underrepresented languages (Armenian and Somali). Conversely, human-in-the-loop translations achieved comparable, often better, outcomes to professional translations for all languages, (e.g., Armenian mean overall quality: 3.9 [95% CI 3.7-4.2] vs. professional 3.6 [3.4-3.9], p = 0.01), were most frequently preferred (46.5% vs. 28.4%) and had shorter mean translation time (7.1 [5.4-8.8] vs. 16.8 [13.7-19.9] min, p < 0.001). Human-in-the-loop strategies may enable safe, efficient, equitable machine translation application in clinical practice.

npj Digital MedicineVol. 8(1)
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), Boston Medical Center (US), Boston Children's Hospital (US), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), State University of New York (US), Kaiser Permanente (US), Harvard University (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University (US), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US), University of Mississippi Medical Center (US), NYU Langone Health (US), St. John Medical Center (US), Avalon University School of Medicine (CW), Center for Pain and the Brain (US), Boston Children's Museum (US), Mercy Medical Center (US), St. Christopher's Hospital for Children (US), Children's Hospital of Richmond at VCU (US), New York University (US), Stanford University (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
8.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.