Sacubitril/valsartan preserves kidney function in rats with cardiorenal syndrome after myocardial infarction

Renal dysfunction in heart failure increases mortality, limits treatment options and blunts responses to therapy. Angiotensin receptor-blocker and neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) may preserve renal function by modulating both the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and the natriuretic peptide system. We investigated the renal effects of the ARNI Sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) in rats with systolic dysfunction secondary to myocardial infarction. Male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent surgical MI induction and were randomized to six weeks of treatment with vehicle, valsartan or Sac/Val, and compared to sham operated animals. Renal function was evaluated by creatinine clearance, mean arterial pressure (MAP) by tail-cuff measurements, and cardiac function by magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography. Vehicle treated animals developed cardiorenal syndrome, with impaired cardiac systolic function and mild renal dysfunction. Both valsartan and Sac/Val preserved renal function compared to vehicle (creatinine clearance mL/min [median with interquartile range]; sham 5.4 [4.8-6.0], vehicle 4.5 [4.1-5.1], valsartan 5.1 [5.1-5.5], Sac/Val 5.1 [5.0-5.6]; vehicle vs valsartan p = 0.034 and vehicle vs Sac/Val p = 0.044). MAP was reduced by both treatments compared to sham and vehicle groups (MAP mmHg; sham 131 [116-138], vehicle 123 [115-132], valsartan 108 [99-112], Sac/Val 111 [99-119]; sham vs valsartan p < 0.001 and sham vs Sac/Val p = 0.003, vehicle vs valsartan p = 0.006 and vehicle vs Sac/Val p = 0.041). Only Sac/Val reduced left atrial dilatation (diameter mm; sham 4.1 [3.7-4.4], vehicle 4.6 [3.8-5.6], valsartan 4.6 [4.1-5.5], Sac/Val 3.9 [3.6-4.5]; vehicle vs Sac/Val p = 0.047, valsartan vs Sac/Val p = 0.017) despite no improvement in systolic function in either treatment group. Sac/Val initiated in the acute post-MI phase preserved renal function to the same extent as valsartan alone and uniquely reduced left atrial dilatation, suggesting additional benefits beyond renoprotection in the setting of persistent systolic dysfunction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0335214
Primary Topic
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sacubitril/valsartan preserves kidney function in rats with cardiorenal syndrome after myocardial infarction

Kaja Knudsen Bergo, Rizwan I. Hussain, Ida Marie Hauge‐Iversen, Emil Knut Stenersen Espe et al.
PLoS ONE
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
article

Sacubitril/valsartan preserves kidney function in rats with cardiorenal syndrome after myocardial infarction

Kaja Knudsen Bergo, Rizwan I. Hussain, Ida Marie Hauge‐Iversen, Emil Knut Stenersen Espe, Alessandro Cataliotti, Ivar Sjaastad, Bård Andre Bendiksen, Gary McGinley, Einar Sjaastad Nordén, Sabine Leh, Lili Zhang, Hans-Peter Marti
article en

Abstract

Renal dysfunction in heart failure increases mortality, limits treatment options and blunts responses to therapy. Angiotensin receptor-blocker and neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) may preserve renal function by modulating both the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and the natriuretic peptide system. We investigated the renal effects of the ARNI Sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) in rats with systolic dysfunction secondary to myocardial infarction. Male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent surgical MI induction and were randomized to six weeks of treatment with vehicle, valsartan or Sac/Val, and compared to sham operated animals. Renal function was evaluated by creatinine clearance, mean arterial pressure (MAP) by tail-cuff measurements, and cardiac function by magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography. Vehicle treated animals developed cardiorenal syndrome, with impaired cardiac systolic function and mild renal dysfunction. Both valsartan and Sac/Val preserved renal function compared to vehicle (creatinine clearance mL/min [median with interquartile range]; sham 5.4 [4.8-6.0], vehicle 4.5 [4.1-5.1], valsartan 5.1 [5.1-5.5], Sac/Val 5.1 [5.0-5.6]; vehicle vs valsartan p = 0.034 and vehicle vs Sac/Val p = 0.044). MAP was reduced by both treatments compared to sham and vehicle groups (MAP mmHg; sham 131 [116-138], vehicle 123 [115-132], valsartan 108 [99-112], Sac/Val 111 [99-119]; sham vs valsartan p < 0.001 and sham vs Sac/Val p = 0.003, vehicle vs valsartan p = 0.006 and vehicle vs Sac/Val p = 0.041). Only Sac/Val reduced left atrial dilatation (diameter mm; sham 4.1 [3.7-4.4], vehicle 4.6 [3.8-5.6], valsartan 4.6 [4.1-5.5], Sac/Val 3.9 [3.6-4.5]; vehicle vs Sac/Val p = 0.047, valsartan vs Sac/Val p = 0.017) despite no improvement in systolic function in either treatment group. Sac/Val initiated in the acute post-MI phase preserved renal function to the same extent as valsartan alone and uniquely reduced left atrial dilatation, suggesting additional benefits beyond renoprotection in the setting of persistent systolic dysfunction.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(10)
Oslo University Hospital (NO), OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO), University of Oslo (NO), Haukeland University Hospital (NO), Institutt for Eksperimentell Medisinsk Forskning (NO), University of Bergen (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.