Sacubitril/valsartan preserves kidney function in rats with cardiorenal syndrome after myocardial infarction
Renal dysfunction in heart failure increases mortality, limits treatment options and blunts responses to therapy. Angiotensin receptor-blocker and neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) may preserve renal function by modulating both the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and the natriuretic peptide system. We investigated the renal effects of the ARNI Sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) in rats with systolic dysfunction secondary to myocardial infarction. Male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent surgical MI induction and were randomized to six weeks of treatment with vehicle, valsartan or Sac/Val, and compared to sham operated animals. Renal function was evaluated by creatinine clearance, mean arterial pressure (MAP) by tail-cuff measurements, and cardiac function by magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography. Vehicle treated animals developed cardiorenal syndrome, with impaired cardiac systolic function and mild renal dysfunction. Both valsartan and Sac/Val preserved renal function compared to vehicle (creatinine clearance mL/min [median with interquartile range]; sham 5.4 [4.8-6.0], vehicle 4.5 [4.1-5.1], valsartan 5.1 [5.1-5.5], Sac/Val 5.1 [5.0-5.6]; vehicle vs valsartan p = 0.034 and vehicle vs Sac/Val p = 0.044). MAP was reduced by both treatments compared to sham and vehicle groups (MAP mmHg; sham 131 [116-138], vehicle 123 [115-132], valsartan 108 [99-112], Sac/Val 111 [99-119]; sham vs valsartan p < 0.001 and sham vs Sac/Val p = 0.003, vehicle vs valsartan p = 0.006 and vehicle vs Sac/Val p = 0.041). Only Sac/Val reduced left atrial dilatation (diameter mm; sham 4.1 [3.7-4.4], vehicle 4.6 [3.8-5.6], valsartan 4.6 [4.1-5.5], Sac/Val 3.9 [3.6-4.5]; vehicle vs Sac/Val p = 0.047, valsartan vs Sac/Val p = 0.017) despite no improvement in systolic function in either treatment group. Sac/Val initiated in the acute post-MI phase preserved renal function to the same extent as valsartan alone and uniquely reduced left atrial dilatation, suggesting additional benefits beyond renoprotection in the setting of persistent systolic dysfunction.
Authors
- Kaja Knudsen Bergo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3322-0929)
- Rizwan I. Hussain
- Ida Marie Hauge‐Iversen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2839-1061)
- Emil Knut Stenersen Espe (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8500-4921)
- Alessandro Cataliotti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5476-8523)
- Ivar Sjaastad (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0131-2036)
- Bård Andre Bendiksen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2010-4881)
- Gary McGinley
- Einar Sjaastad Nordén
- Sabine Leh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0764-2941)
- Lili Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0822-8065)
- Hans-Peter Marti
Institutions
- Oslo University Hospital (NO)
- OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO)
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
- Institutt for Eksperimentell Medisinsk Forskning (NO)
- University of Bergen (NO)
Publication Details
- Journal
- PLoS ONE
- Published
- 2025-10-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0335214
- Primary Topic
- Heart Failure Treatment and Management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00