Simulating Justice: Using Roleplay and Moot Court to Teach Human Rights in Value-Diverse Environments

Teaching human rights law poses distinct challenges in societies where political, cultural, or religious values reduce the emphasis on individual rights. Traditional liberal democratic frameworks often clash with local worldviews, creating student resistance and disengagement. This study explores how simulation-based learning through roleplay and moot courts can enhance human rights education in value-diverse or resistant contexts. Using a systematic literature review, it analyzes global case studies to evaluate the pedagogical, ethical, and affective impacts of simulations. Findings show that simulations improve engagement, empathy, and critical thinking while offering a neutral environment for discussing controversial issues. However, effectiveness depends on skilled facilitation and contextual adaptation. The study concludes that simulations are transformative tools that strengthen students’ legal reasoning, empathy, and professional competence in culturally plural environments.