Safety of reproduced pharmaceuticals and legal issues of their circulation in Russia

Due to restrictions on importing medicines from abroad, the domestic pharmaceutical industry is shifting its focus towards the development and manufacturing generic drugs - medications containing a pharmacological substance identical to the original (previously patented/registered). However, the issue of drug interchangeability remains a subject of debate in both scientific circles and practical applications. Bioequivalence studies often raise concerns due to disparitites in therapeutic effects, posing a high risk of adverse reactions and symptoms. The authors aim to establish a comprehensive understanding of the feasibility and safety of introducing generic drugs in the Russian Federation. To achieve this goal, they utilize a range of general scientific cognitive methods, including analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, and generalization, as well as systemic, logical-semantic and dialectical approaches. Special legal methodologies, such as formal legal, comparative legal and technical legal analyses, are also employed. It has become evident that generic drug safety and effectiveness in Russia are not subject to thorough evaluation. Analogues are entering the market without undergoning essential therapeutic equivalence assessments, leaving their specific pharmacological properties merely a matter of speculation. The study concludes that while maintaining the balance in the pharmaceutical market through generic drugs is essential, it must be executed with caution. Balancing public interests in replacing foreign drugs with domestic alternatives must be done in harmony with private interests. The authors advocate for a judicial practice that prioritizes individual patient rights, regardless of the country of origin of the drug, since restrictions on the rights of drug’s country of origin, as limiting citizens’ access to medically necessary drugs - domestic or foreign - undermines the fundamental right to healthcare.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
RUDN JOURNAL OF LAW
Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2337-2024-28-4-875-891
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety of reproduced pharmaceuticals and legal issues of their circulation in Russia

Alexander Savoskin, Vitaliy A. Rukoleev
1 citations
RUDN JOURNAL OF LAW
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
1.13
article

Safety of reproduced pharmaceuticals and legal issues of their circulation in Russia

Alexander Savoskin, Vitaliy A. Rukoleev
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Due to restrictions on importing medicines from abroad, the domestic pharmaceutical industry is shifting its focus towards the development and manufacturing generic drugs - medications containing a pharmacological substance identical to the original (previously patented/registered). However, the issue of drug interchangeability remains a subject of debate in both scientific circles and practical applications. Bioequivalence studies often raise concerns due to disparitites in therapeutic effects, posing a high risk of adverse reactions and symptoms. The authors aim to establish a comprehensive understanding of the feasibility and safety of introducing generic drugs in the Russian Federation. To achieve this goal, they utilize a range of general scientific cognitive methods, including analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, and generalization, as well as systemic, logical-semantic and dialectical approaches. Special legal methodologies, such as formal legal, comparative legal and technical legal analyses, are also employed. It has become evident that generic drug safety and effectiveness in Russia are not subject to thorough evaluation. Analogues are entering the market without undergoning essential therapeutic equivalence assessments, leaving their specific pharmacological properties merely a matter of speculation. The study concludes that while maintaining the balance in the pharmaceutical market through generic drugs is essential, it must be executed with caution. Balancing public interests in replacing foreign drugs with domestic alternatives must be done in harmony with private interests. The authors advocate for a judicial practice that prioritizes individual patient rights, regardless of the country of origin of the drug, since restrictions on the rights of drug’s country of origin, as limiting citizens’ access to medically necessary drugs - domestic or foreign - undermines the fundamental right to healthcare.

RUDN JOURNAL OF LAWVol. 28(4)
Ural State University of Economics (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.