Comparative Analysis of the Concept of Multipolarity in the Political and Scientific Discourses of Russia and China

One of the possible scenarios for resolving the turbulence in world politics that is being observed is a switch to a multipolar world order. Russia and China are major powers that have stated in the public affairs that a multipolar world order is a real option to a unipolar one. The article is exploring the concept of multipolarity in the political and scientific discourses of Russia and China, using the method of comparative analysis to identify how strategically the vision of a multipolar world in Russia and China coincides in official and scientific discourses. The novelty of the research lies in the study of the coincidence or divergence in the approach to understanding the concert of multipolarity in China and Russia. The results of the study demonstrate that the official discourses of the two countries differ at the level of rhetoric of previous generations of leaders. But both approaches to multipolarity converge under the current leadership. In Russian scientific discourse there is variability in interpretations of the term, while in China the theoretical understanding of multipolarity proposed at the official level is supported. In general, a comparative analysis of the concept of multipolarity in the official discourse and scientific understanding of Russia and China confirms that the strategic understanding of the approach of building a multipolar world in the China and Russia coincides.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
RUDN Journal of Studies in Literature and Journalism
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9220-2025-30-1-172-185
Primary Topic
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of the Concept of Multipolarity in the Political and Scientific Discourses of Russia and China

Natalia A. Ivanova, Dmitry Novikov, Xuesong Fan
RUDN Journal of Studies in Literature and Journalism
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
article

Comparative Analysis of the Concept of Multipolarity in the Political and Scientific Discourses of Russia and China

Natalia A. Ivanova, Dmitry Novikov, Xuesong Fan
article en

Abstract

One of the possible scenarios for resolving the turbulence in world politics that is being observed is a switch to a multipolar world order. Russia and China are major powers that have stated in the public affairs that a multipolar world order is a real option to a unipolar one. The article is exploring the concept of multipolarity in the political and scientific discourses of Russia and China, using the method of comparative analysis to identify how strategically the vision of a multipolar world in Russia and China coincides in official and scientific discourses. The novelty of the research lies in the study of the coincidence or divergence in the approach to understanding the concert of multipolarity in China and Russia. The results of the study demonstrate that the official discourses of the two countries differ at the level of rhetoric of previous generations of leaders. But both approaches to multipolarity converge under the current leadership. In Russian scientific discourse there is variability in interpretations of the term, while in China the theoretical understanding of multipolarity proposed at the official level is supported. In general, a comparative analysis of the concept of multipolarity in the official discourse and scientific understanding of Russia and China confirms that the strategic understanding of the approach of building a multipolar world in the China and Russia coincides.

RUDN Journal of Studies in Literature and JournalismVol. 30(1)
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU), Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RU), Moscow State Institute of International Relations (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.