Methods of Social Identity Analysis: Problems and Prospects for Their Resolution (Brief Review)

What are the methods of social identity analysis in terms of the radicalization risk assessment model? The answer to this question determines the aim of the proposed brief review. On the one hand, the model of assessing the risk of radicalization in adolescence and youth is based on the ideas of the social identity approach as well as on the uncertainty-identity model. As a result, the predominant interest is directed towards the methods developed in the field of social identity approach. On the other hand, it seems possible to expand the scope of analysis, including the tools used in other theoretical frameworks. By integrating these two lines of research, three main types of social identity analysis tools (associative technique tools, scales, and social identity mapping) are identified and critically analyzed. Conclusions are made about the advantages of each social identity measurement tool. In addition, it is emphasized that within the framework of the risk assessment model, it would be most appropriate to develop a complex methodological strategy, including a modified version of the Twenty Statements Test , followed by social identity mapping.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics
Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2024-21-2-633-656
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methods of Social Identity Analysis: Problems and Prospects for Their Resolution (Brief Review)

Б.Г. Бовин, И.Б. Бовина
RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Methods of Social Identity Analysis: Problems and Prospects for Their Resolution (Brief Review)

Б.Г. Бовин, И.Б. Бовина
article en

Abstract

What are the methods of social identity analysis in terms of the radicalization risk assessment model? The answer to this question determines the aim of the proposed brief review. On the one hand, the model of assessing the risk of radicalization in adolescence and youth is based on the ideas of the social identity approach as well as on the uncertainty-identity model. As a result, the predominant interest is directed towards the methods developed in the field of social identity approach. On the other hand, it seems possible to expand the scope of analysis, including the tools used in other theoretical frameworks. By integrating these two lines of research, three main types of social identity analysis tools (associative technique tools, scales, and social identity mapping) are identified and critically analyzed. Conclusions are made about the advantages of each social identity measurement tool. In addition, it is emphasized that within the framework of the risk assessment model, it would be most appropriate to develop a complex methodological strategy, including a modified version of the Twenty Statements Test , followed by social identity mapping.

RUDN Journal of Psychology and PedagogicsVol. 21(2)
Federal Penitentiary Service (RU), Moscow State University of Psychology & Education (RU)
University of Cambridge, European Commission, Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.