Ethical Aspects of Measuring Intelligence: Towards Competence and Fairness

The article is focused on the problem of intelligence measurement, with an emphasis on the ethical aspects of developing and using tests. The history of intelligence measurement provides a variety of examples, problematic from an ethical point of view, which have repeatedly led to negative consequences for both individuals and entire communities. The purpose of this article is to describe current ethical issues in the field of intelligence measurement, their background and historical examples. We discuss the ethical issues in terms of: (1) global approaches to operationalizing intelligence; 2) possible human rights violations resulting from the use of intelligence tests; 3) the fairness of intelligence tests for different groups of respondents; and 4) assessment of test quality in test selection. These issues are examined through the prism of the ethical principles of psychologists, such as respect, honesty, competence, and responsibility. Despite the extensive history of measuring intelligence and research in this area, ethical issues raised decades ago have not lost their relevance. Since ethical questions often do not have clear-cut answers, we believe that engaging in discussions about ethical issues in intelligence testing and exploring potential solutions is itself important and warranted. The content and conclusions of this article may be useful for both researchers and practitioners to make informed decisions in the context of intelligence measurement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics
Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2024-21-2-657-682
Primary Topic
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical Aspects of Measuring Intelligence: Towards Competence and Fairness

Екатерина Орел, А.А. Куликова, Tatjana Kanonire, Tatiana I. Logvinenko
RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
article

Ethical Aspects of Measuring Intelligence: Towards Competence and Fairness

Екатерина Орел, А.А. Куликова, Tatjana Kanonire, Tatiana I. Logvinenko
article en

Abstract

The article is focused on the problem of intelligence measurement, with an emphasis on the ethical aspects of developing and using tests. The history of intelligence measurement provides a variety of examples, problematic from an ethical point of view, which have repeatedly led to negative consequences for both individuals and entire communities. The purpose of this article is to describe current ethical issues in the field of intelligence measurement, their background and historical examples. We discuss the ethical issues in terms of: (1) global approaches to operationalizing intelligence; 2) possible human rights violations resulting from the use of intelligence tests; 3) the fairness of intelligence tests for different groups of respondents; and 4) assessment of test quality in test selection. These issues are examined through the prism of the ethical principles of psychologists, such as respect, honesty, competence, and responsibility. Despite the extensive history of measuring intelligence and research in this area, ethical issues raised decades ago have not lost their relevance. Since ethical questions often do not have clear-cut answers, we believe that engaging in discussions about ethical issues in intelligence testing and exploring potential solutions is itself important and warranted. The content and conclusions of this article may be useful for both researchers and practitioners to make informed decisions in the context of intelligence measurement.

RUDN Journal of Psychology and PedagogicsVol. 21(2)
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU), Sirius University of Science and Technology (RU)
American Educational Research Association, Yale University, McGill University, University of Cambridge, University of Oxford, Russian Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.