Destructive Discourse in the Modern Conditionsof Belarusian-Russian Bilingualism

The study presents the findings of a study of Belarusian destructive discourse in the comparative aspect of the language code used (the Belarusian and Russian languages). Destructive discourse in the paper is understood in the legal linguistic aspect as a practice of verbal interaction, the content of which does not correspond to the dispositions of the legal field. In this regard, texts sent by investigative and inquiry bodies and courts for linguistic examination were used as factual research material (in total, 74 units were selected for 2021-2023: 56 Russian-speaking, 18 Belarusian-speaking). The quantitative parameters of the studied texts correlate with statistical data on the preferences of Belarusian citizens in using language as a means of interpersonal and institutional communication. As a result of the analysis, it was established that there are no serious discrepancies in the extralinguistic characteristics of conflict-producing texts. They are subject to active digitalization and gravitate towards small genre forms. At the same time, Belarusian-language texts are less likely to have a creolized form. More differences are found in the sociolinguistic portrait of the subject of the destructive discourse implementation: a Belarusian-speaking delinquent usually has a higher education and is older in age. Male participants dominate in both types of destructive communication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polylinguality and Transcultural Practices
Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22363/2618-897x-2024-21-4-632-640
Primary Topic
Linguistics and language evolution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Destructive Discourse in the Modern Conditionsof Belarusian-Russian Bilingualism

Anton A. Lavitski
Polylinguality and Transcultural Practices
Linguistics and language evolution
article

Destructive Discourse in the Modern Conditionsof Belarusian-Russian Bilingualism

Anton A. Lavitski
article en

Abstract

The study presents the findings of a study of Belarusian destructive discourse in the comparative aspect of the language code used (the Belarusian and Russian languages). Destructive discourse in the paper is understood in the legal linguistic aspect as a practice of verbal interaction, the content of which does not correspond to the dispositions of the legal field. In this regard, texts sent by investigative and inquiry bodies and courts for linguistic examination were used as factual research material (in total, 74 units were selected for 2021-2023: 56 Russian-speaking, 18 Belarusian-speaking). The quantitative parameters of the studied texts correlate with statistical data on the preferences of Belarusian citizens in using language as a means of interpersonal and institutional communication. As a result of the analysis, it was established that there are no serious discrepancies in the extralinguistic characteristics of conflict-producing texts. They are subject to active digitalization and gravitate towards small genre forms. At the same time, Belarusian-language texts are less likely to have a creolized form. More differences are found in the sociolinguistic portrait of the subject of the destructive discourse implementation: a Belarusian-speaking delinquent usually has a higher education and is older in age. Male participants dominate in both types of destructive communication.

Polylinguality and Transcultural PracticesVol. 21(4)
Belarussian State Pedagogical University Named After Maxim Tank (BY), International University MITSO (BY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Linguistics and language evolution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Destructive Discourse in the Modern Conditionsof Belarusian-Russian Bilingualism — Anton A. Lavitski · Polylinguality and Transcultural Practices (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS